ReviewTheranostics2024
Targeted radiopharmaceuticals: an underexplored strategy for ovarian cancer.
Review in Theranostics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tumour Microenvironment-Informed Radiotheranostics: Why and How Nuclear Medicine Could Advance Precision Oncology in the Decade Ahead.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy worldwide with the highest mortality. This low survival rate can be attributed to the fact that symptoms arise only at an advanced disease stage, characterized by a (micro)metastatic spread across the peritoneal cavity. Radiopharmaceuticals, composed of a targeting moiety coupled with either a diagnostic or therapeutic radionuclide, constitute a relatively underexplored theranostic approach that may improve the current standard of care. Efficient patient stratification, follow-up and treatment are several caveats that could be addressed with theranostics to improve patient outcomes. So far, the bulk of research is situated and often halted at the preclinical level, employing murine models of primary and metastatic peritoneal disease that do not necessarily provide an accurate representation of the disease heterogeneity, (intrinsic) drug resistance or the complex physiological interactions with the tumor microenvironment. Radioimmunoconjugates with therapeutic α- and electron-emitting radionuclides have been the prevailing standard, targeting a myriad of cell-membrane markers that are expressed in the various heterogeneous histological subtypes of ovarian cancer. Evidently, several hurdles exist within preclinical research that are potentially withholding these agents from advancing into clinical practice. On the other hand, the field of nuclear medicine has also seen significant innovation to address shortcomings related to target/ligand identification, preclinical research models, radiochemistry, radiopharmacy and dosimetry, as outlined in this review. Altogether, theranostics hold great promise to answer an unmet medical need for ovarian cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.