Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39430965›Full record

ArticleACS measurement science au2024

Optimizing Solid Microneedle Design: A Comprehensive ML-Augmented DOE Approach.

Ahmed Choukri Abdullah, Erfan Ahmadinejad, Savas Tasoglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS measurement science au, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Microneedle-Assisted Cell Delivery and Therapy.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmed Choukri AbdullahDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2313-184X
Erfan AhmadinejadDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8317-0909
Savas TasogluDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4604-217X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microneedles (MNs), that is, a matrix of micrometer-scale needles, have diverse applications in drug delivery, skincare therapy, and health monitoring. MNs offer a minimally invasive alternative to hypodermic needles, characterized by rapid and painless procedures, cost-effective fabrication methods, and reduced tissue damage. This study explores four MN designs, cone-shaped, tapered cone-shaped, pyramidal with a square base, and pyramidal with a triangular-shaped base, and their optimization based on predefined criteria. The workflow encompasses three loading conditions: compressive load during insertion, critical buckling load, and bending loading resulting from incorrect insertion. Geometric parameters such as base radius/width, tip radius/width, height, and tapered angle tip influence the output criteria, namely, total deformation, critical buckling loads, factor of safety (FOS), and bending stress. The comprehensive framework employing a design of experiment approach within the ANSYS workbench toolbox establishes a mathematical model and a response surface fitting model. The resulting regression model, sensitivity chart, and response curve are used to create a multiobjective optimization problem that helps achieve an optimized MN geometrical design across the introduced four shapes, integrating machine learning (ML) techniques. This study contributes valuable insights into a potential ML-augmented optimization framework for MNs via needle designs to stay durable for various physiologically relevant conditions.

Identifiers

PMID39430965
PMCPMC11487659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.