ArticleEpilepsy & behavior reports2024
Clinician Understanding, Acceptance and utilization of Ketogenic diet therapy for epilepsy in Australia and New Zealand: An online survey.
Article in Epilepsy & behavior reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A price check on the ketogenic diet for adults with epilepsy in Australia.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ketogenic diet therapy (KDT) is an established treatment for people with epilepsy. As increasing evidence demonstrates effectiveness and safety of KDT on seizure reduction, cognition and behaviour, it is essential to evaluate factors hindering and supporting neurologists in prescribing KDT to strengthen quality, evidence-based, appropriate and equitable care. A study of Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) neurologists was undertaken via an online survey. Demographics, clinical role characteristics, perceptions of knowledge, use and experiences of KDT for epilepsy treatment were assessed. Responses were analysed using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model. 114 neurologists participated (18 % response rate). All were aware of KDT for epilepsy treatment, most (90 %) perceived it as acceptable and 85 % identified suitable patients in their practice. Poor knowledge of the KDT referral processes was a barrier for 64 %. Clinical role characteristics were significantly associated with perceived level of knowledge and use of KDT in practice, being more likely among paediatric neurologists), epileptologists and those in urban practices (p < 0.00001). Most neurologists (90 %) endorsed adoption of a KDT guideline to facilitate use of KDT in epilepsy management. This study established that KDT is accepted as a suitable treatment for epilepsy in ANZ. There is high variability in perceived knowledge and skills related to KDT, which impacts on utilization in clinical practice. Further education and resources for clinicians, allied health and community support agencies are needed to optimise the use of this valuable therapy. Additionally, a clear referral pathway would improve patient access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.