ArticleJournal of bone oncology2024
-AI-assisted diagnostic potential of CT in bone oncology and its impact on clinical decision-making for intensive care.
Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluates the AI-assisted diagnostic potential of computed tomography (CT) for bone cancer and its influence on patient care during the pre- and post-treatment phases. It compares patient management approaches based on CT severity levels and identifies distinct CT phenotypes linked to disease severity. Methodology: We retrospectively examined 50 patients diagnosed with bone cancer between December 2022 and June 2023. The CT scans were analyzed according to the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) guidelines. This study was performed using the deep convolutional neutral network (DCNN) model to assist doctors in diagnosing bone tumors through CT scanning. Patients' management approaches were compared based on the severity levels indicated by CT scans. Results: Fifty patients participated in this study, with a median age of 67.2 years, ranging from 32 to 89 years. Of them, 38 % were female and 62 % were male. In 2022, 19 individuals (13 males and 6 females, ages 32 to 84) were assessed, with a mean age of 59.9 years. In 2023, 31 individuals, aged 54 to 89 with a mean age of 71.6 years, were assessed; among them were 18 men and 13 women. SPECT scans revealed the following key diagnostic features: 85.9 % of patients exhibited bone lesions with ground-glass opacities, 88 % had multipolar involvement, 92.8 % had bilateral involvement, and 92.8 % showed peripheral involvement. The severity scores based on CT scans were significantly higher in patients requiring intensive care, with scores above 14 being more common in this group. Conclusion: Distinct CT findings during the AI-assisted diagnosis and treatment of bone cancer provided prompt and sensitive examination capabilities. Notably, two CT phenotypes emerged, associated with large consolidation patterns and high severity scores, offering crucial insights into disease severity and aiding in clinical decision-making for intensive care requirements. The study underscores the importance of CT in the effective monitoring and management of bone cancer pre- and post-treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.