Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39430797›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2024

In-person prospective audit and feedback on an oncology ward: development of an immunocompromised antimicrobial stewardship program.

Hannah Imlay, Sage B Greenlee, Brandon J Tritle, Nora F Fino, Emily S Spivak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hannah ImlayDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3429-4655
Sage B GreenleeDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Brandon J TritleDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4636-3785
Nora F FinoDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Emily S SpivakDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4314-9644

Funding

CTSA UM1 Program at University of UtahUM1TR004409 · NCATS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI RACHEL HESS, Jennifer Juhl Majersik · 2023 to 2026
$21.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To describe clinical syndromes, opportunities for antimicrobial optimization, and acceptance of recommendations made by an immunocompromised antimicrobial stewardship program performing in-person prospective audit and feedback (IPPAF) on inpatient oncology services. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Three inpatient oncology services including patients with solid tumor malignancies in an academic cancer center. Patients: Hospitalized adults with oncologic malignancies receive antimicrobials for any indication. Methods: We reviewed all patients receiving antimicrobials on inpatient oncology services who were included in IPPAF and prospectively documented clinical syndromes represented, most common recommendations, and acceptance rate. We also examined the standardized antimicrobial administration ratio (SAAR) for oncology units over the study period. Results: Over 34 weeks, we performed 154 interventions for 138 patients. Metastatic malignancy was common (52%) and 90-day mortality was high (43%). Diagnostic uncertainty was common (33/154, 21%), as were cases of intra-abdominal pathology (30/154, 19%), pneumonia (25/154, 16%), and urinary tract infection (12/154, 8%). The most common recommendations were changes in duration (63/154, 41%) and stopping antimicrobials for syndromes determined to be noninfectious (29/154, 19%). Acceptance of interventions was high (77% overall) and several SAARs on the primary oncology unit significantly decreased after starting IPPAF. Conclusions: We identified numerous opportunities for antimicrobial optimization among solid tumor malignancy patients. Most clinical syndromes were ones also encountered frequently in non-oncology populations, but several were unique and represented opportunities for targeted education.

Identifiers

PMID39430797
PMCPMC11488469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.