ReviewBMJ neurology open2024
Review of theories into the pathogenesis of normal pressure hydrocephalus.
Review in BMJ neurology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensor-derived heel pressure metrics capture reversible gait dysfunction beyond conventional gait measures in normal pressure hydrocephalus.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Observational
- Alzheimer's disease core biomarkers are associated with worse baseline and postoperative cognitive profiles in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: findings from the Bologna PRO-Hydro study.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2026Article
- Causal Relationship Between Neurotrophins and Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Insights From a Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarkers in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: comparison with Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Expert Guidance on Cognitive Impairment in Alzheimer's Disease: A Practical Seven-Step Approach from the United Arab Emirates.Neurology and therapy · 2025Article
- Brain fluid physiology in ischaemic stroke; more than just oedema.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2025Review
- Article
- A case of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus without enlarged ventricle and with negative tap test.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Ventriculomegaly without elevated intracranial pressure? Normal pressure hydrocephalus as a disorder of the cerebral windkessel.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Cerebrospinal Fluid Classical Biomarker Levels in Mixed vs. Pure ABiomedicines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) represents a unique form of hydrocephalus characterised by the paradox of ventriculomegaly without significant elevations in intracranial pressure, with the clinical triad of gait instability, cognitive impairment, and urinary incontinence. A myriad of neurobiological correlates have been implicated in its pathophysiology. We review the literature to provide an up-to-date, narrative review of the proposed mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of NPH, proposing a holistic framework through which to understand the condition. We conducted a narrative review of the literature on NPH, assessing the various mechanisms underlying its pathophysiology and clinical presentation. NPH represents a unique form of hydrocephalus manifesting as a disorder of the cerebral vasculature, characterised by arteriosclerosis and reduced intracranial elastance. There are multiple mechanisms underlying its pathophysiology, which include windkessel impairment causing redistribution of intracranial pulsatility from the subarachnoid space to the ventricles, reductions in cerebral blood flow, impaired glymphatic clearance, reduced blood-brain barrier integrity and alterations in venous haemodynamics. Moreover, NPH shares similar clinical features and pathological mechanisms as other neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. The severity of each respective mechanism of pathophysiology can lead a patient to develop one condition versus another. Analysing NPH as a disorder of the cerebral vasculature, glymphatics, and most of all, the distribution of intracranial pulsatility, provides a novel framework through which to understand and manage this condition, one which requires further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.