Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39430751›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2024

A structural, genetic and clinical comparison of CAR-T cells and CAR-NK cells: companions or competitors?

Alain E Andrea, Andrada Chiron, Guillaume Sarrabayrouse, Stéphanie Bessoles, Salima Hacein-Bey-Abina

Abstract readReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. NK Cells: A Powerful Squad Versus SARS-CoV-2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Rendering NK Cells Antigen-Specific for the Therapy of Solid Tumours.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alain E Andrea *Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Saint George University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Andrada Chiron *Université Paris Cité, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité des Technologies Chimiques et Biologiques pour la Santé (UTCBS), Paris, France.
Guillaume SarrabayrouseUniversité Paris Cité, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité des Technologies Chimiques et Biologiques pour la Santé (UTCBS), Paris, France.
Stéphanie Bessoles *Université Paris Cité, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité des Technologies Chimiques et Biologiques pour la Santé (UTCBS), Paris, France.
Salima Hacein-Bey-Abina *Université Paris Cité, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité des Technologies Chimiques et Biologiques pour la Santé (UTCBS), Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, following the groundbreaking achievements of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in hematological cancers, and advancements in cell engineering technologies, the exploration of other immune cells has garnered significant attention. CAR-Therapy extended beyond T cells to include CAR natural killer (NK) cells and CAR-macrophages, which are firmly established in the clinical trial landscape. Less conventional immune cells are also making their way into the scene, such as CAR mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells. This progress is advancing precision medicine and facilitating the development of ready-to-use biological treatments. However, in view of the unique features of natural killer cells, adoptive NK cell immunotherapy has emerged as a universal, allogenic, "off-the shelf" therapeutic strategy. CAR-NK cytotoxic cells present targeted tumor specificity but seem to be devoid of the side effects associated with CAR-T cells. CAR-NK cells appear to be potentially promising candidates for cancer immunotherapy. However, their application is hindered by significant challenges, particularly the limited persistence of CAR-NK cells in the body, which poses a hurdle to their sustained effectiveness in treating cancer. Based upon the foregoing, this review discusses the current status and applications of both CAR-T cells and CAR-NK cells in hematological cancers, and provides a comparative analysis of the structure, genetics, and clinical outcomes between these two types of genetically modified immune cells.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveKiller Cells, NaturalReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAnimalsHematologic NeoplasmsHumansReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCAR-NK cellsCAR-T cellsCytokinesHematological malignanciesOff-the-shelf Immunotherapies

Identifiers

PMID39430751
PMCPMC11486669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.