ArticleDigital health
Efficient patient care in the digital age: Online appointment scheduling in an ophthalmology practice.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural network for natural language processing to determine treatment urgency in an ophthalmology emergency department.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Digital Divide in Awareness, Want, and Adoption Across Diverse eHealth Services: Cross-Sectional Survey of Inpatients in Jinan, China.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Building an ultrasound appointment system: focusing on instrument diversity and the scope of physician expertise.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- From Paper to Platform: Evaluating the Shift From Manual to Electronic Surgical Booking in a Large Hospital Setting.Cureus · 2025Article
- Digital transformation with clinical alerts and personalized care systems in an integrated value based model.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Efficient patient care in the digital age: impact of online appointment scheduling in a medical practice and a university hospital on the "no-show"-rate.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite its potential to improve patient access, streamline administration, and enhance healthcare efficiency, systematic data on online appointment scheduling (OAS) in medical practices is lacking. Method: Prospective, single center study conducted at an ophthalmology practice. Over a period of 12 weeks, all booked appointments, both online made via the OAS system, and offline made by practice staff via phone, email, or in-person, were recorded across four doctor consultations. Patient demographics, booking type (new appointment/rescheduled/cancelled), date and time of the booking, and the next available appointment slot were documented. Results: 1080 interactions (new booking 76.8%, rescheduling 13.1%, cancellation 10.1%) were made by 880 patients via OAS and 2427 appointments offline by 1902 patients. Patients booking offline were older than those booking online (mean 50.3 ± 28.1 years vs. 41.7 ± 22.2, p < 0.0001). No difference between the groups was found regarding sex distribution (both, female around 59%, male around 41%, p = 0.81). New patients showed a preference for booking online (p < 0.0001). 63.1% of online bookings occurred on weekdays during practice hours. 36.8% of cancellations/reschedulings were made one to two days before the appointment. These vacant slots were promptly filled again, as OAS was primarily used for near-term bookings (booking time to appointment ≤7 days in 47.7%; selection of the earliest available appointment in 44.1%). Compared to appointments made offline the no-show rate was reduced by OAS (6.8%, n = 164, vs. 1.6%, n = 13, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: OAS contributes to patient-centered and efficient resource utilization in healthcare by reducing no-show rates and promptly filling vacant slots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.