ArticleDigital health
A deep learning algorithm model to automatically score and grade obstructive sleep apnea in adult polysomnography.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosing Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Photoplethysmography: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Performance of AI-Based Screening Tools for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Across Apnea-Hypopnea Index Thresholds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Multichannel machine learning for polysomnographic diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea: a Bayesian meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Cardiovascular Disease: Mechanisms, Diagnostics, and Emerging Therapeutic Approaches.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Comprehensive Nursing Intervention Improves Polysomnography Success, Safety, and Patient Experience in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Nocturnal blood pressure burden: towards a better understanding of the OSA-hypertension relationship.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025Article
- AI-Assisted Awake Endoscopic Video Analysis for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Detection.Nature and science of sleep · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Polysomnography (PSG) is unique in diagnosing sleep disorders, notably obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Despite its advantages, manual PSG data grading is time-consuming and laborious. Thus, this research evaluated a deep learning-based automated scoring system for respiratory events in sleep-disordered breathing patients. Methods: A total of 1000 case PSG data were enrolled to develop a deep learning algorithm. Of the 1000 data, 700 were distributed for training, 200 for validation, and 100 for testing. The respiratory events scoring deep learning model is composed of five sequential layers: an initial layer of perceptrons, followed by three consecutive layers of long short-term memory cells, and ultimately, an additional two layers of perceptrons. Results: The PSG data of 100 patients (simple snoring, mild, moderate, and severe OSA; n = 25 in each group) were selected for validation and testing of the deep learning model. The algorithm demonstrated high sensitivity (95% CI: 98.06-98.51) and specificity (95% CI: 95.46-97.79) across all OSA severities in detecting apnea/hypopnea events, compared to manual PSG analysis. The deep learning model's area under the curve values for predicting OSA in apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 5, 15, and 30 groups were 0.9402, 0.9388, and 0.9442, respectively, showing no significant differences between each group. Conclusion: The deep learning algorithm employed in our study showed high accuracy in identifying apnea/hypopnea episodes and assessing the severity of OSA, suggesting the potential for enhancing both the efficiency and accuracy of automated respiratory event scoring in PSG through advanced deep learning techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.