Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39430691›Full record

ArticleDigital health

A deep learning algorithm model to automatically score and grade obstructive sleep apnea in adult polysomnography.

Marn Joon Park, Ji Ho Choi, Shin Young Kim, Tae Kyoung Ha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Multichannel machine learning for polysomnographic diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea: a Bayesian meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Nocturnal blood pressure burden: towards a better understanding of the OSA-hypertension relationship.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marn Joon ParkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Ji Ho ChoiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5194-930X
Shin Young KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
Tae Kyoung HaHoneynaps Research and Development Center, Honeynaps Co. Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Polysomnography (PSG) is unique in diagnosing sleep disorders, notably obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Despite its advantages, manual PSG data grading is time-consuming and laborious. Thus, this research evaluated a deep learning-based automated scoring system for respiratory events in sleep-disordered breathing patients. Methods: A total of 1000 case PSG data were enrolled to develop a deep learning algorithm. Of the 1000 data, 700 were distributed for training, 200 for validation, and 100 for testing. The respiratory events scoring deep learning model is composed of five sequential layers: an initial layer of perceptrons, followed by three consecutive layers of long short-term memory cells, and ultimately, an additional two layers of perceptrons. Results: The PSG data of 100 patients (simple snoring, mild, moderate, and severe OSA; n = 25 in each group) were selected for validation and testing of the deep learning model. The algorithm demonstrated high sensitivity (95% CI: 98.06-98.51) and specificity (95% CI: 95.46-97.79) across all OSA severities in detecting apnea/hypopnea events, compared to manual PSG analysis. The deep learning model's area under the curve values for predicting OSA in apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 5, 15, and 30 groups were 0.9402, 0.9388, and 0.9442, respectively, showing no significant differences between each group. Conclusion: The deep learning algorithm employed in our study showed high accuracy in identifying apnea/hypopnea episodes and assessing the severity of OSA, suggesting the potential for enhancing both the efficiency and accuracy of automated respiratory event scoring in PSG through advanced deep learning techniques.

Indexed as

AIartificial intelligenceconvoluted neural networkdeep learningobstructive sleep apneaOSApolysomnographyPSGSleep apneasnoring

Identifiers

PMID39430691
PMCPMC11489947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.