Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39430688›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect conservation2024

Habitat associations of day-flying Lepidoptera and their foodplants within nature reserves in Bedfordshire, UK.

Esme Ashe-Jepson, Juliet Anderson, Gwen E Hitchcock, Sky Wallis, Keira Wingader, Andrew J Bladon, Edgar C Turner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect conservation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Esme Ashe-JepsonDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3872-295X
Juliet AndersonDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2909-5299
Gwen E HitchcockThe Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Northamptonshire, The Manor House, Broad Street, Cambourne, Cambridge, CB23 6DH UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0540-4202
Sky WallisDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ UK.
Keira WingaderDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ UK.
Andrew J BladonDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2677-1247
Edgar C TurnerDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2715-2234

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract: Species often associate with specific habitat characteristics, resulting in patchy distributions, whereby they only occupy a proportion of available habitat. Understanding which characteristics species require is a valuable tool for informing conservation management. We investigated the associations of eleven species of day-flying Lepidoptera larvae and their foodplants with habitat characteristics within calcareous grassland reserves in Bedfordshire, UK, across two scales relevant to land managers and target species: the reserve (cardinal aspect, vegetation type) and foodplant patch scale (foodplant height and density). We investigated whether ecological traits (habitat specialism, as defined at a national-scale, and overwintering life stage) influenced the strength of associations. At the reserve scale, we found variation in associations with habitat characteristics across species, with species that overwinter at non-adult life stages having more restricted associations, indicating that they may be more vulnerable to environmental change. Associations were generally stronger with vegetation type than aspect, which can be manipulated more easily by land managers. Seven species had similar associations with habitat characteristics to their foodplants, implying that management to benefit foodplants will also benefit larvae. However, the remaining four species had different associations to their foodplants, and may require alternative management approaches. At the foodplant patch scale, four species were associated with foodplant characteristics, which could be used to inform effective fine-scale management. Implications for insect conservation: Implications for insect conservation: Diverse habitat associations imply that topographic and vegetation variation are valuable for supporting diverse assemblages of butterflies and their foodplants. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10841-024-00554-7.

Indexed as

ButterflyClimate changeHabitat preferenceHabitat useLarvaLepidoptera

Identifiers

PMID39430688
PMCPMC11489185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.