ArticlePain reports2024
An innovative phase 2 chronic pain master protocol design to assess novel mechanisms in multiple pain types.
Article in Pain reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05986292 (A Master Protocol for Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Clinical Trials of Multiple Interventions for the Treatment of Chronic Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Master Protocol for Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Clinical Trials of Multiple Interventions for the Treatment of Chronic Pain
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The phase 2 chronic pain master protocol (CPMP) presented here provides a construct to accelerate the investigation of novel analgesics, broadly referred to here as mechanisms. Designed to address historical challenges in analgesic research and development, such as the choice of indication, this protocol enables the efficient evaluation of potential therapeutics with different mechanisms of action in 3 pain types: nociceptive pain (osteoarthritis), neuropathic pain (diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain), and mixed pain (chronic low back pain). Methods: The study design was determined before the identification of any specific molecule. Statistical simulations were conducted to optimize the methodology and design, the culmination of which were submitted to and accepted by the Complex Innovative Trial Design Pilot Meeting Program, a unique collaboration with the United States Food and Drug Administration. Benefits of the CPMP include limiting the number of study participants exposed to placebo and reducing the total sample size over time by leveraging placebo data across studies within a pain type and efficacy data across pain types for a specific molecule. The CPMP design enables: (1) efficient evaluation of multiple novel mechanisms of action; (2) the study of multiple molecules simultaneously or serially; (3) direct statistical comparison of molecules within a pain type; and (4) efficient planning and conduct of clinical studies. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05986292. Perspective: By evaluating novel mechanisms across different pain types, therapeutic potential can be assessed more efficiently compared with traditional individual clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.