ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2024
Successful intravascular lithotripsy after all other options failed with stent under-expansion: a case report and review of alternative options.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Management of under-expansion stent using intravascular lithotripsy under OCT guidance: a case report and systematic review.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical Outcomes of Intravascular Lithotripsy for Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions: A Single-Center Study.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2026Article
- A review of the pathogenic mechanism and clinical management progress of in-stent calcification restenosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stent under-expansion, often caused by severe circumferential coronary calcification, must be prevented as it increases the risk of neoatherosclerosis and stent thrombosis. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is an effective lesion preparation strategy to enable sufficient expansion of a stent that was initially not sufficiently expanded. Case summary: A 62-year-old male patient presented in our emergency department due to unstable angina. Coronary angiography revealed one-vessel coronary artery disease with high-grade stenosis of the proximal to mid right coronary artery. Direct implantation of a drug-eluting stent was performed. However, stent under-expansion was noticed. Post-dilatation with semi-compliant balloon up to 24 bar was unsuccessful. Subsequent dilatation with an ultra-high-pressure OPN non-compliant balloon at 50 bar resulted to balloon rupture but stent under-expansion remained. Therefore, IVL was performed, resulting in complete stent expansion already at 4 bar. The patient was put on dual platelet treatment, and his further clinical course was uneventful after 6 months of follow-up. Discussion: The present case report highlights the role of IVL as a safe and effective treatment option in case of immediate stent under-expansion. This has significant implications on daily practice as under-expansion may lead to high rates of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis. Furthermore, this case report underlines the impact of lesion preparation, even in presumably less complex lesion by angiographic criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.