Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39430593›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Validity of a four-item questionnaire in French assessing attachment to meat.

Paul Sebo, Benoit Tudrej, Augustin Bernard, Bruno Delaunay, Alexandra Dupuy, Claire Malavergne, Hubert Maisonneuve

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paul SeboUniversity Institute for Primary Care (IuMFE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Benoit TudrejUniversity College of General Medicine, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Augustin BernardUniversity Institute for Primary Care (IuMFE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Bruno DelaunayUniversity Institute for Primary Care (IuMFE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Alexandra DupuyUniversity Institute for Primary Care (IuMFE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Claire MalavergneUniversity Institute for Primary Care (IuMFE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hubert MaisonneuveUniversity Institute for Primary Care (IuMFE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The 16-item Meat Attachment Questionnaire (MAQ-16) assesses emotional and cognitive attachment to meat across four dimensions: hedonism, affinity, entitlement, and dependence. Recently validated in French, we aimed to develop and validate a shorter, four-item version (MAQ Methods: In this 2023 observational study in the Rhône-Alpes region, 919 primary care patients were invited to complete the French MAQ-16 (MAQ Results: A total of 822 patients participated (65.3% women; median age = 52; participation rate = 89.5%). The MAQ Conclusion: The MAQ

Indexed as

attachment to meatfrenchMAQmeat attachment questionnaireprimary carevalidation

Identifiers

PMID39430593
PMCPMC11486648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.