ReviewRegenerative therapy2024
Regenerative medicine in cardiovascular disease.
Review in Regenerative therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in novel biomaterials for cardiovascular tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.PeerJ · 2026Review
- UV-cure hydrogels for cardiac regeneration: a comprehensive review.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Review
- Bone Marrow Niche in Cardiometabolic Disease: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential.Circulation research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Owing to the rapid increase in the number of people with severe heart failure, regenerative medicine is anticipated to play a role in overcoming the limitations inherent in existing surgical interventions. There are essentially two types of cardiac regenerative therapies for a failing heart. Cellular regenerative therapies using various stem cells improve the functional recovery of the heart mainly by cytokine paracrine effects. The implantation of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes can contribute not only to the inhibition of adverse heart remodeling by paracrine effects but also to the supply of newly born functional myocytes with the recipient myocardium as "mechanically working cells." Cell transplantation, including autologous myoblast transplantation, reduces heart failure exacerbations and benefits patients without the need for other treatment options. Although cellular therapy is currently the mainstream approach, it requires an in-house cell-processing center with an aseptic environment. In addition, these stem cells are usually introduced via several invasive delivery methods, including intracoronary administration, and cellular sheet implantation. Simplifying the culture methods for these cells is a crucial problem that needs to be resolved. Drug-induced regenerative therapy is another option that enhances self-endogenous regenerative systems in the human body and does not require invasive methods or cell cultures. Therefore, drug-induced regenerative therapies may overcome the disadvantages of these cellular therapies. The purpose of this report is to summarize cell transplantation therapy in the cardiovascular system and regenerative therapy for heart failure using an autologous endogenous regenerative system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.