ArticleRegenerative therapy2024
Osteogenic effects and safety of human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived megakaryocytes and platelets produced on a clinical scale.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Platelet-rich plasma obtained by centrifuging peripheral blood can promote osteogenesis owing to its abundant growth factors but has drawbacks, including rapid growth factor loss and inconsistent effects depending on donor factors. To overcome these issues, we were the first in the world to use freeze-dried human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived megakaryocytes and platelets (S-FD-iMPs) and found that they have osteogenesis-promoting effects. Since turbulence was found to activate platelet biogenesis and iPS cell-derived platelets can now be produced on a clinical scale by a device called VerMES, this study examined the osteogenesis-promoting effect and safety of clinical-scale FD-iMP (V-FD-iMPs) for future human clinical application. Method: We administered either S-FD-iMPs, V-FD-iMPs, or saline along with artificial bone to the lumbar spine of 8-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 4 each) and evaluated bone formation by computed tomography (CT) and pathology. Next, we administered V-FD-iMPs or saline along with artificial bone to the lumber spines of 5-week-old male New Zealand White rabbits (n = 4 each) and evaluated the bone formation by CT and pathology. Rats (n = 10) and rabbits (n = 6) that received artificial bone and V-FD-iMPs in the lumbar spine were also observed for 6 months for adverse events, including infection, tumor formation, and death. Results: Both V-FD-iMPs and S-FD-iMPs significantly enhanced osteogenesis in the lumber spines of rats in comparison with the controls 8 weeks postoperatively, with no significant differences between them. Furthermore, V-FD-iMPs vigorously promoted osteogenesis in the lumber spines of rabbits 8 weeks postoperatively. In rats and rabbits, V-FD-iMPs showed no adverse effects, including infection, tumor formation, and death, over 6 months. Conclusion: These results suggest that V-FD-iMPs promote safe osteogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.