Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39430572›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2024

3D digital light process bioprinting: Cutting-edge platforms for resolution of organ fabrication.

Yun Geun Jeong, James J Yoo, Sang Jin Lee, Moon Suk Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yun Geun JeongDepartment of Molecular Science and Technology, Ajou University, 206 World Cup-ro, Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon, 16499, South Korea.
James J YooWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
Sang Jin LeeWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
Moon Suk KimDepartment of Molecular Science and Technology, Ajou University, 206 World Cup-ro, Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon, 16499, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in the field of regenerative medicine, which replaces or restores the function of human damaged organs is advancing rapidly. These advances are fostering important innovations in the development of artificial organs. In recent years, three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has emerged as a promising technology for regenerative medicine applications. Among various techniques, digital light process (DLP) 3D bioprinting stands out for its ability to precisely create high-resolution, structurally complex artificial organs. This review explores the types and usage trends of DLP printing equipment, bioinks, and photoinitiators. Building on this foundation, the applications of DLP bioprinting for creating precise microstructures of human organs and for regenerating tissue and organ models in regenerative medicine are examined. Finally, challenges and future perspectives regarding DLP-based bioprinting, particularly for precision printing applications in regenerative medicine, are discussed.

Indexed as

BioinksBioprintingDigital light processRegenerative medicineResolution

Identifiers

PMID39430572
PMCPMC11490710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.