Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39430511›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

PollenNet: A novel architecture for high precision pollen grain classification through deep learning and explainable AI.

F M Javed Mehedi Shamrat, Mohd Yamani Idna Idris, Xujuan Zhou, Majdi Khalid, Sharmin Sharmin, Zeseya Sharmin, Kawsar Ahmed, Mohammad Ali Moni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

F M Javed Mehedi ShamratDepartment of Computer System and Technology, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Mohd Yamani Idna IdrisDepartment of Computer System and Technology, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Xujuan ZhouSchool of Business, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.
Majdi KhalidDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, College of Computing, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, 21955, Saudi Arabia.
Sharmin SharminDepartment of Computer System and Technology, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Zeseya SharminSchool of Information Technology, Faculty of Science Engineering and Built Environment, Deakin University, Australia.
Kawsar AhmedDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, S7N 5A9.
Mohammad Ali MoniAI & Digital Health Technology, Artificial Intelligence & Cyber Future Institute, Charles Stuart University, Bathurst, NSW, 2795, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pollen grains play a critical role in environmental, agricultural, and allergy research despite their tiny dimensions. The accurate classification of pollen grains remains a significant challenge, mainly attributable to their intricate structures and the extensive diversity of species. Traditional methods often lack accuracy and effectiveness, prompting the need for advanced solutions. This study introduces a novel deep learning framework, PollenNet, designed to tackle the intricate challenge of pollen grain image classification. The efficiency of PollenNet is thoroughly evaluated through stratified 5-fold cross-validation, comparing it with cutting-edge methods to demonstrate its superior performance. A comprehensive data preparation phase is conducted, including removing duplicates and low-quality images, applying Non-local Means Denoising for noise reduction, and Gamma correction to adjust image brightness. Furthermore, Explainable AI (XAI) is utilized to enhance the interpretability of the model, while Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis serves as a quantitative method for evaluating the model's capabilities. PollenNet demonstrates superior performance when compared to existing models, with an accuracy of 98.45 %, precision of 98.20 %, specificity of 98.40 %, recall of 98.30 %, and f1-score of 98.25 %. The model also maintains low Mean Squared Error (0.03) and Mean Absolute Error (0.02) rates. The ROC curve analysis, the low False Positive Rate (0.016), and the False Negative Rate (0.017) highlight the reliability and dependability of the model. This study significantly improves the efficacy of classifying pollen grains, indicating an important advancement in the application of deep learning for ecological research.

Indexed as

Deep learningExplainable AIImage processingPollen grain classificationPollenNet model

Identifiers

PMID39430511
PMCPMC11490855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.