ReviewHeliyon2024
Acceptance of artificial intelligence in university contexts: A conceptual analysis based on UTAUT2 theory.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI Integration in Undergraduate Medical Education: Qualitative Study of Faculty Perspectives in the United Arab Emirates.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Adoption of circular agricultural practices among small-scale farmers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence Use on Perceived English Learning Achievement: The Roles of Use Behavior and Task-Technology Fit.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Factors influencing large language model adoption among dental students: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Applying UTAUT2 model to investigate acceptance of DeepSeek by Chinese university students for academic use.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Exploring administrative staff's acceptance of generative AI in Chinese vocational colleges: A UTAUT-guided thematic study.PloS one · 2026Article
- The impact of AI integration in project preparation in education course on pre-service teachers' innovativeness, AI anxiety, attitudes, and acceptance.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- The mediating role of work stress and the performance expectations in the effect of academic overload on the use of AI models among preservice teachers: a cross-sectional study.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Evolving Perceptions and Attitudes to Adopting Generative AI in Professional Settings: Multicenter Longitudinal Qualitative Study of Senior Chinese Hospital Leaders.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Parents', Teachers', and Sledders' Acceptability of a Virtual Reality Game for Sledding Safety Education: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- What is the influence of psychosocial factors on artificial intelligence appropriation in college students?BMC psychology · 2025Article
- AI adoption among adolescents in education: extending the UTAUT2 with psychological and contextual factors.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in emergency department triage: perspective of human professionals.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review examined, through the UTAUT2 model, the factors influencing the acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in university contexts. A total of 50 scientific texts published between 2018 and 2023 were analyzed and selected after a rigorous search of specialized databases. These findings confirm the versatility of UTAUT2 in elucidating technological adoption processes in higher education. Performance expectancy and hedonic motivation emerged as significant predictors of intentions and effective use among students, faculty, and administrative staff. Among students, perceived ease of use and social influence were also relevant. The analysis revealed differences in adoption patterns between STEM and non-STEM disciplines and between public and private institutions. Despite widespread positive perceptions of AI's potential, barriers such as distrust and lack of knowledge persist. The research also identified moderating and mediating factors, such as prior technology experience and technological self-efficacy. These results have important implications for the implementation of AI in higher education, suggesting the need for differentiated approaches according to the characteristics of each group and institutional context. It is recommended to develop strategies that address the identified barriers and leverage facilitators, with an emphasis on training, ethical design, and contextual adaptation of AI applications. Future research should explore the longitudinal evolution of these factors and examine AI adoption in non-STEM disciplines in greater depth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.