Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39430455›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Acceptance of artificial intelligence in university contexts: A conceptual analysis based on UTAUT2 theory.

Benicio Gonzalo Acosta-Enriquez, Emma Verónica Ramos Farroñan, Luigi Italo Villena Zapata, Francisco Segundo Mogollon Garcia, Helen Catalina Rabanal-León, Jahaira Eulalia Morales Angaspilco, Jesús Catherine Saldaña Bocanegra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benicio Gonzalo Acosta-EnriquezUniversidad Nacional de Trujillo, Peru.
Emma Verónica Ramos FarroñanUniversidad Cesar Vallejo, Peru.
Luigi Italo Villena ZapataUniversidad Cesar Vallejo, Peru.
Francisco Segundo Mogollon GarciaUniversidad Cesar Vallejo, Peru.
Helen Catalina Rabanal-LeónUniversidad Cesar Vallejo, Peru.
Jahaira Eulalia Morales AngaspilcoUniversidad Señor de Sipán, Peru.
Jesús Catherine Saldaña BocanegraUniversidad Cesar Vallejo, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review examined, through the UTAUT2 model, the factors influencing the acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in university contexts. A total of 50 scientific texts published between 2018 and 2023 were analyzed and selected after a rigorous search of specialized databases. These findings confirm the versatility of UTAUT2 in elucidating technological adoption processes in higher education. Performance expectancy and hedonic motivation emerged as significant predictors of intentions and effective use among students, faculty, and administrative staff. Among students, perceived ease of use and social influence were also relevant. The analysis revealed differences in adoption patterns between STEM and non-STEM disciplines and between public and private institutions. Despite widespread positive perceptions of AI's potential, barriers such as distrust and lack of knowledge persist. The research also identified moderating and mediating factors, such as prior technology experience and technological self-efficacy. These results have important implications for the implementation of AI in higher education, suggesting the need for differentiated approaches according to the characteristics of each group and institutional context. It is recommended to develop strategies that address the identified barriers and leverage facilitators, with an emphasis on training, ethical design, and contextual adaptation of AI applications. Future research should explore the longitudinal evolution of these factors and examine AI adoption in non-STEM disciplines in greater depth.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceHigher educationSystematic reviewTechnology adoptionUTAUT2

Identifiers

PMID39430455
PMCPMC11489141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.