ArticleHeliyon2024
Risk prediction model for pneumothorax or pleural effusion after microwave ablation in patients with lung malignancy.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although microwave ablation (MWA) has been shown to be an effective treatment for lung malignancies (LM), there is no effective way to predict pneumothorax or pleural effusion after MWA so that timely measures can be taken to prevent it. Methods: This study comprised LM patients undergoing MWA at Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University from January 2013 to September 2023. Patients before May 2023 constituted the training set (n = 340), while data from May to September served as the test set (n = 58). Unformatted and formatted data extracted from electronic medical records (EMR) were utilized for model construction. Predictors for pneumothorax or pleural effusion were determined through univariate analysis and backward stepwise regression in the training set. Six ML algorithms were employed to create four models based on the research timeframe. Evaluation of the four models was performed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, area under the ROC curve (AUC), and 10-fold cross validation. Findings: A total of 398 patients (216 aged 70 or above, 271 males) were included, with 23.37 % (93/398) experiencing pneumothorax and 33.42 % (133/398) developing pleural effusion. Across all four predictive models, Logistic Regression (LR) demonstrated optimal predictive performance in the test set, with AUC values of 0.727 for Model Ⅰ, 0.876 for Model Ⅱ, 0.895 for Model Ⅲ, and 0.807 for Model Ⅳ. Interpretation: ML models effectively predict post-MWA pneumothorax or pleural effusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.