Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39430408›Full record

ArticleJournal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty2024

Use of a Low Profile Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Diaphyseal Humeral Cement Restrictor in Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Elizabeth C Bond, Suzanne Finley, Elizabeth Pennington, Emily K Reinke, Lewis McGarvey, Grant E Garrigues, Tally E Lassiter, Oke A Anakwenze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth C BondDuke Sports Sciences Institute, Division of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1343-5658
Suzanne FinleyDuke Sports Sciences Institute, Division of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Elizabeth PenningtonDuke Sports Sciences Institute, Division of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Emily K ReinkeDuke Sports Sciences Institute, Division of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Lewis McGarveyDuke Sports Sciences Institute, Division of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Grant E GarriguesDepartment of Orthopaedics, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Tally E LassiterDuke Sports Sciences Institute, Division of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Oke A AnakwenzeDuke Sports Sciences Institute, Division of Orthopaedics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Support for QA/QC for Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002553 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JENNIFER S, MCNAMARA, JAMES O. · 2018 to 2023
$58.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: When implanting a cemented humeral stem, a reliable method to prevent inappropriate extension and enable pressurization of cement in the intramedullary canal is required. The aim was to assess the outcomes of a dedicated humeral diaphyseal cement restrictor. Methods: In total 218 shoulders (207 patients) were included in the study, all of whom underwent a cemented total shoulder arthroplasty and a retrospective review was performed. The primary outcomes of interest were device stability in the medullary canal, successful occlusion of the canal, cement extrusion and quality of cement mantle. Results: The majority of the cohort was female (63.3%) males and the average patient age was 71.7 years (SD 8.45). In 81.7% the device was deemed to be stable in the medullary canal. The device was significantly more stable in primary (84.2%) compared to revision cases (64.3%, p = 0.02). In 69.7% Barrack grade A mantle quality was achieved, this was higher in primary cases (74.2%) compared to revision cases (39.3%) (p = 0.00006). Discussion: We noted excellent cementation outcomes using a cement restrictor specifically designed for the diaphyseal humerus anatomy. However, this humeral specific restrictor was noted to be more stable in primary as compared to revision cases.

Indexed as

cementcement mantlecement restrictorreverse shoulder arthroplastyrevision shoulder arthroplastyShoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39430408
PMCPMC11487543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.