ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2024
Efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Population-Based Nomogram for Predicting Overall Survival in Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma With Real-World External Validation.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- The pathogenesis and therapeutic management of rare pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
- Rapid and aggressive recurrence of pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma after curative resection: a case report.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- G-CSF-producing pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy followed by durvalumab: a case report.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinomas (PSC) are notorious for their poor prognosis and resistance to chemotherapy. The literature suggests that immunotherapy might be effective against this aggressive tumor. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy, either alone or combined with chemotherapy, as first-line treatment for PSC patients. Methods: In a retrospective, multicentric, real-world study conducted between July 2017 and April 2021, patients with stage III (ineligible for surgery or radio-chemotherapy) or stage IV PSC were enrolled. These patients received their first-line treatment with immunotherapy and were categorized into two groups based on their treatment modality: the immuno-chemotherapy (IO CT) group or the immunotherapy-alone (IO) group. Results: This study analyzed a population of 34 patients from eight different hospital centers. In this cohort, the objective response rate (ORR) was 56%, median duration of response was 20.5 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.11 months, and median overall survival (OS) 13.9 months. Demographic characteristics remained consistent among the treatment groups except for the age (54.0- and 71.0-year-old in the IO CT and IO group, respectively, P=0.02). The IO CT group demonstrated an ORR of 64.0%, a median PFS at 8.72 months, and a median OS of 16.08 months, while the IO group displayed respective values of 52.0%, 3.45 months, and 13.11 months. Conclusions: This study showed the potential efficacy of immunotherapy as a first-line treatment for PSC. While acknowledging the retrospective nature of the study, our findings suggest a trend favoring the combination of IO CT over IO alone in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.