ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2024
Ten-year survival outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perioperative Systemic Therapies in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Long-Term Oncological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Updated Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Analysis of influencing factors of recurrence after thoracoscopic resection in patients with Stage I a lung adenocarcinoma.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Liposomal Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine, and Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia for Adult Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Retraospective Cohort Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Efficacy of combined silk suture ligation and stapler versus stapler alone for vascular control in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- COPD Severity as an Independent Predictor of Long-Term Survival in Operable Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis from a High-Volume Thoracic Surgery Center.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the widespread adoption of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for major lung resection, the 10-year long-term survival outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with VATS compared with open major lung resection is lacking. The purpose of this study was to analyze the short- and long-term outcomes of VATS Methods: The perioperative outcomes and long-term survival of p-stage I-III NSCLC patients who underwent major lung resection via VATS Results: Of the 10,167 patients who underwent surgery for lung malignancies, 6,405 patients with stage I-III NSCLC were included in the study, including 4,224 in the VATS group and 2,181 in the open group. PSM resulted in 1,487 patients in both the VATS and open groups. The patients were matched by patient demographics, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), tumor histology and TNM stage. Compared with open surgery, major lung resection via VATS resulted in less blood loss (median: 50 Conclusions: Major lung resection via the VATS should be the preferred surgical option for stage I-III NSCLC patients due to its superior long-term survival outcome and advantages of less blood loss and shorter postoperative hospital stays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.