ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2024
Establishment of a survival predictive model for patients with two synchronous multiple primary lung cancers: a multicenter cohort analysis.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Paired Inter-Lesion Invasiveness and Recurrence Risk in Synchronous Multiple Primary Lung Adenocarcinoma: Focus on the IAC-Dominant Subgroup.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Spread Through Air Spaces in Multiple Synchronous Bilateral Primary Lung Cancer: Prognostic Implications in a Surgical Cohort.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prognostic predictors of the synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (SMPLC) still remain unclear, and there is a lack of studies on the prognosis of SMPLC patients excluding those with multifocal ground-glass/lepidic (GG/L) nodules. The aim of this study is to develop an effective model for predicting survival of SMPLC patients. Methods: In this multicenter cohort study, a total of 831 SMPLC patients presenting for lung cancer resection from January 2004 to January 2018 at five institutions were included for developing and validating a nomogram model. Specifically, 499 patients from the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University were served as the training cohort. A total of 332 patients from The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, and Beijing Liangxiang Hospital were served as the external validation cohort. The nomogram model was compared with the Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) system for the overall survival. The C-index, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to evaluate the model performance. A user-friendly website for SMPLC survival probability calculation was also provided for a better understanding of prognosis of patients with resected SMPLC. Results: A total of seven independent risk factors were selected by conducting a multivariate analysis on the training set. Further, a nomogram model was developed with these factors. Both the internal and external validations exhibited good discrimination (C-index: internal, 0.827; external, 0.784). The NRI and IDI of this model were 0.33 and 0.21, respectively. The survival rates for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year were consistent with the actual observed values. A set of cutoff values were determined by grouping the patients into three different groups. For each group, we should expect a significant distinction between survival curves. Conclusions: The novel nomogram model enables accurate survival risk stratification of patients with resected SMPLC and may assist in decision-making that is conducive to patients with SMPLC at high risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.