Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39430216›Full record

ArticleCancer innovation2024

Explainable artificial intelligence in breast cancer detection and risk prediction: A systematic scoping review.

Amirehsan Ghasemi, Soheil Hashtarkhani, David L Schwartz, Arash Shaban-Nejad

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer innovation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amirehsan GhasemiDepartment of Pediatrics, Center for Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine University of Tennessee Health Science Center Memphis Tennessee USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9288-6731
Soheil HashtarkhaniDepartment of Pediatrics, Center for Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine University of Tennessee Health Science Center Memphis Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7750-6294
David L SchwartzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine University of Tennessee Health Science Center Memphis Tennessee USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7235-5586
Arash Shaban-NejadDepartment of Pediatrics, Center for Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine University of Tennessee Health Science Center Memphis Tennessee USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2047-4759

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advances in artificial intelligence (AI), data-driven algorithms are becoming increasingly popular in the medical domain. However, due to the nonlinear and complex behavior of many of these algorithms, decision-making by such algorithms is not trustworthy for clinicians and is considered a black-box process. Hence, the scientific community has introduced explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to remedy the problem. This systematic scoping review investigates the application of XAI in breast cancer detection and risk prediction. We conducted a comprehensive search on Scopus, IEEE Explore, PubMed, and Google Scholar (first 50 citations) using a systematic search strategy. The search spanned from January 2017 to July 2023, focusing on peer-reviewed studies implementing XAI methods in breast cancer datasets. Thirty studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The results revealed that SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) is the top model-agnostic XAI technique in breast cancer research in terms of usage, explaining the model prediction results, diagnosis and classification of biomarkers, and prognosis and survival analysis. Additionally, the SHAP model primarily explained tree-based ensemble machine learning models. The most common reason is that SHAP is model agnostic, which makes it both popular and useful for explaining any model prediction. Additionally, it is relatively easy to implement effectively and completely suits performant models, such as tree-based models. Explainable AI improves the transparency, interpretability, fairness, and trustworthiness of AI-enabled health systems and medical devices and, ultimately, the quality of care and outcomes.

Indexed as

breast cancerdeep learningexplainable artificial intelligenceinterpretable AImachine learningXAI

Identifiers

PMID39430216
PMCPMC11488119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.