Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39430194›Full record

ReviewKidney international reports2024

N-acetylcysteine in Kidney Disease: Molecular Mechanisms, Pharmacokinetics, and Clinical Effectiveness.

Estefani Y Hernández-Cruz, Omar E Aparicio-Trejo, Fadi A Hammami, Daniel Bar-Shalom, Martin Tepel, Jose Pedraza-Chaverri, Alexandra Scholze

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney international reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Redefining the role of the thiol-based agentRSC medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Over-Intake of Plant-Derived Antioxidants, HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Estefani Y Hernández-CruzLaboratory F-315, Department of Biology, Faculty of Chemistry, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Omar E Aparicio-TrejoDepartment of Cardio-Renal Pathophysiology, Ignacio Chávez National Institute of Cardiology, Mexico City, Mexico.
Fadi A HammamiDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Daniel Bar-ShalomDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martin TepelDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jose Pedraza-ChaverriLaboratory F-315, Department of Biology, Faculty of Chemistry, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alexandra ScholzeDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has shown beneficial effects in both acute kidney disease and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in preclinical and clinical studies. Different dosage and administration forms of NAC have specific pharmacokinetic properties that determine the temporal pattern of plasma concentrations of NAC and its active metabolites. Especially in acute situations with short-term NAC administration, appropriate NAC and glutathione (GSH) plasma concentrations should be timely ensured. For oral dosage forms, bioavailability needs to be established for the respective NAC formulation. Kidney function influences NAC pharmacokinetics, including a reduction of NAC clearance in advanced CKD. In addition, mechanisms of action underlying beneficial NAC effects depend on kidney function as well as comorbidities, both involving GSH deficiency, alterations in nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)-dependent signaling, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and disturbed mitochondrial bioenergetics. This also applies to nonrenal NAC mechanisms. The timing of preventive NAC administration in relation to potential injury is important. NAC administration seems most effective either preceding, or preceding and paralleling conditions that induce tissue damage. Furthermore, studies suggest that very high concentrations of NAC should be avoided because they could exert reductive stress. Delayed administration of NAC might interfere with endogenous repair mechanisms. In conclusion, studies on NAC treatment regimens need to account for both NAC pharmacokinetics and NAC molecular effects. Kidney function of the patient population and pathomechanisms of the kidney disease should guide rational NAC trial design. A targeted trial approach and biomarker-guided protocols could pave the way for the use of NAC in precision medicine.

Indexed as

acute kidney injurychronic kidney diseaseglutathionemitochondrial functionN-acetylcysteinepharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID39430194
PMCPMC11489428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.