Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39430192›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2024

A Survey on End-of-Life Contemplation Among Patients on Dialysis.

Martin Russwurm, Anetta Rabaev, Joachim D Hoyer, Christian S Haas, Christian Volberg, Philipp Russ

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Paradigm Shift: Dialysis as a Terminal Condition.Kidney international reports · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martin RusswurmDivision of Nephrology, Centre for Internal Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Anetta RabaevDivision of Nephrology, Centre for Internal Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Joachim D HoyerDivision of Nephrology, Centre for Internal Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Christian S HaasDivision of Nephrology, Centre for Internal Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Christian VolbergDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Philipp RussDivision of Nephrology, Centre for Internal Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Considering that mortality among patients on dialysis is high, it would be advisable for patients, relatives, and care givers to acknowledge that after dialysis initiation for many patients, the last phase in life has begun. We sought to investigate the frequency of precautionary planning directives, contemplation about the end-of-life (EOL) and embedding of patients' wishes in the interaction with relatives and the treating nephrologists. Methods: In a questionnaire-based interview survey, we investigated the frequency of precautionary planning, EOL wishes, and frequency of relatives' or medical professionals' conversations with patients about those wishes as well as possibly associated demographic, socioeconomic and medical factors. The interviews were conducted by a single investigator in 7 dialysis centers in Germany. Results: From 349 identified patients, 268 (77%) participated. The participants (36% female) had a median age of 70 (interquartile range [IQR]: 58-80) years and had spent a median of 3 (IQR: 1-7.5) years on dialysis. Overall, 46% of patients on dialysis contemplated their EOL wishes at least occasionally. Of those, 85% talked about EOL wishes with their relatives, whereas 19% discussed them with their nephrologists, yet another 28% would like to have such a discussion with their nephrologist. Conclusion: Almost half of patients on dialysis contemplate their EOL and the vast majority engage in discussions about that with their relatives. Despite patients being interested, the frequency of consultation of nephrologists on EOL care is low. This study suggests that there is a substantial but unmet need for EOL care consultation for patients on dialysis.

Indexed as

conservative kidney caredeathend-of-life carehemodialysispalliative care

Identifiers

PMID39430192
PMCPMC11489826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.