Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39430129›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic translation2024

Development of a standardized and reproducible murine femoral distraction osteogenesis model.

Yuejun Lin, Zhaowei Jiang, Jiaming Yang, Ming Wang, Haixing Wang, Xiaoting Zhang, Xuan Lu, Shanshan Bai, Tongzhou Liang, Botai Li and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yuejun LinStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Zhaowei JiangStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Jiaming YangStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Ming WangStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Haixing WangStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Xiaoting ZhangStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Xuan LuStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Shanshan BaiStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Tongzhou LiangStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Botai LiThe Brain Cognition and Brain Disease Institute, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Jie ShaoThe Brain Cognition and Brain Disease Institute, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Lu ZhangThe Brain Cognition and Brain Disease Institute, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Dashuang GaoThe Brain Cognition and Brain Disease Institute, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Jiajun ChenSchool of Medicine, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Sien LinStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Fan YangThe Brain Cognition and Brain Disease Institute, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Gang LiStem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Distraction osteogenesis (DO) has been widely used to treat bone defects as its effectiveness in bone regeneration. Currently, distraction devices for establishing DO models are mainly developed for rats or large animals. However, a mouse DO model is in great need for in-depth mechanistic investigations using various transgenic mice. The current study reports the development of a reproducible murine DO model. Methods: A mini-titanium lengthener was designed and fabricated. The mini-lengthener was applied on the murine femur with four threaded pins using a designed clamp as the drilling and insertion guide. After transverse osteotomy using a Gigli saw, and after 5 days of latency, DO procedures started at 0.3 mm/day for 10 days, and the consolidation period was left for 28 days. The bone formation was monitored by radiography and histology. Potential effects on animal locomotion during DO were also measured by behavior tests. Results: Separated bone segments maintained good alignment during the entire DO phases. New bone formation was found as early as the end of the distraction phase. Active bone remodeling was found between the separated bone segments at late distraction and early consolidation phases. At the mature consolidation phase, bone remodeling was mainly observed in the contact cortical bone. Mice underwent DO procedure did not have significant impairment in their locomotion. Conclusion: We have successfully developed a murine femoral DO model, which may be used to study the biological processes of DO. We also developed the mini-lengthener and the guide clamp to ensure the standardization and reproducibility of the mouse DO model.The translational potential of this article: Current study reports the development of a murine femoral DO model. A well-established murine DO model will facilitate further investigations of the biological mechanisms of DO in various transgenic and normal mice.

Indexed as

Distraction osteogenesisExternal fixatorsLimb lengtheningMouse model

Identifiers

PMID39430129
PMCPMC11488447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.