Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39430092›Full record

ReviewEcancermedicalscience2024

Early adoption of innovation in HPV prevention strategies: closing the gap in cervical cancer.

Ishika Mahajan, Amogh Kadam, Lucy McCann, Aruni Ghose, Katie Wakeham, Navjot Singh Dhillon, Susannah Stanway, Stergios Boussios, Soirindhri Banerjee, Ashwini Priyadarshini and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecancermedicalscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ishika MahajanDepartment of Oncology, Lincoln County Hospital, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, UK.
Amogh KadamGovernment Cuddalore Medical College and Hospital, Chidambaram, India.
Lucy McCannDepartment of Oncology, Barts Cancer Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Aruni GhoseDepartment of Oncology, Barts Cancer Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Katie WakehamDepartment of Oncology, Barts Cancer Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Navjot Singh DhillonDepartment of General Surgery, Pilgrim Hospital, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Boston, Lincolnshire, UK.
Susannah StanwayUnited Kingdom and Ireland Global Cancer Network.
Stergios BoussiosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Gillingham, Kent, UK.
Soirindhri BanerjeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, IPGMER and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, India.
Ashwini PriyadarshiniDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Bhawna SirohiUnited Kingdom and Ireland Global Cancer Network.
Julie S TorodeInstitute of Cancer Policy, Centre for Cancer, Society & Public Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Swarupa MitraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fortis Medical Research Institute, Gurgaon, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the highest prevailing causes of female cancer-related mortality globally. A significant discrepancy in incidence has been noted between high and low-middle-income countries. The origins of CC have been accredited to the human papillomavirus (HPV) with serotypes 16 and 18 being the most prevalent. HPV vaccines, with 90%-97% efficacy, have proven safe and currently function as the primary prevention method. In addition, secondary prevention by timely screening can potentially increase the 5-year survival rate by >90%. High-precision HPV DNA testing has proven to be both highly sensitive and specific for early detection and is advocated by the WHO. Lack of public awareness, poor screening infrastructure and access to vaccines, socio-cultural concerns, along with economic, workforce-associated barriers and the presence of marginalised communities unable to access services have contributed to a continued high incidence. This article comprehensively analyses the efficacy, coverage, benefits and cost-effectiveness of CC vaccines and screening strategies including the transition from cytological screening to HPV self-sampling, while simultaneously exploring the real-world disparities in their feasibility. Furthermore, it calls for the implementation of population-based approaches that address the obstacles faced in approaching the WHO 2030 targets for CC elimination.

Indexed as

cervical cancereliminationHPVPappopulation healthprimary preventionscreeningsecondary preventionvaccine

Identifiers

PMID39430092
PMCPMC11489098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.