ArticleEcancermedicalscience2024
Addressing sexual health in oncology: perspectives and challenges for better care at a national level.
Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of digital interactive interventions on survivorship outcomes in prostate cancer: a systematic narrative review.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring sexual health and function among Malaysian patients with advanced cancer: insights from the EORTC QLQ SH-22 questionnaire.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- The training paradox in oncosexuality: a multinational survey on clinician attitudes, barriers, and sexual health communication in geriatric prostate cancer care.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- The impact on sexual wellbeing after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for ovarian cancer treatment.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2026Article
- Sexual dysfunction among melanoma survivors: a scoping review of current evidence and clinical gaps.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Perceptions and Behaviors of Healthcare Providers Regarding Sexuality in Cervical Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Canadian healthcare provider perspectives and practices in the provision of sexual health support for people with chronic kidney disease: a mixed methods study.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Oncosexology: A Narrative Review on Sexual Health and Quality of Life in Cancer Patients.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Informed and Empowered: A Pre-Post Evaluation of a Whiteboard Video for Sexual Health Education in Female Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Review
- Pre-Implementation Assessment of a Sexual Health eClinic in Canadian Oncology Care.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The emotional impacts of oncological treatments can negatively affect sexual health and intimate relationships. Advances in cancer management have extended patient survival, underscoring the importance of addressing sexual health post-diagnosis. Objectives: To explore physicians' practices regarding the approach to sexual health during oncological consultations; identifying barriers to addressing sexuality and assessing the need for sexual health training. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study that assessed the management of sexual health by physicians involved in oncological treatment, using an anonymous questionnaire distributed via SurveyMonkey. Results: Of 133 physicians surveyed, 31.6% never or rarely address sexual health. Only 10.5% feel frequently prepared on this topic, while 24.8% almost never have the appropriate tools to address it. 97.7% of oncologists and 92.9% of otolaryngologists (ENTs) recognize the need for sexual health training. Sexual health was more frequently discussed among patients diagnosed with prostate, cervical and breast cancer, and less so among those with ENT, bladder and colorectal tumours. The approach was more frequent among patients treated with curative intent (77.4%) than those with palliative intent (5%). The main barriers identified were lack of training (46%), lack of time (39.8%) and patient discomfort (34.6%). Conclusion: The majority of professionals dealing with oncological patients do not address their sexual health, with the lack of training, lack of time and patient discomfort being the main barriers identified. However, 92% indicate a need for sexual health training, which could contribute to early intervention, strategy establishment and timely referral to specialists in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.