Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39430079›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2024

Addressing sexual health in oncology: perspectives and challenges for better care at a national level.

Natalia Camejo, Camila Montenegro, Dahiana Amarillo, Cecilia Castillo, Gabriel Krygier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exploring sexual health and function among Malaysian patients with advanced cancer: insights from the EORTC QLQ SH-22 questionnaire.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalia Camejohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8684-0291.
Camila Montenegrohttps://orcid.org/0009-0004-6888-9544.
Dahiana Amarillohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8615-8639.
Cecilia Castillohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0417-0512.
Gabriel Krygierhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0518-1854.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The emotional impacts of oncological treatments can negatively affect sexual health and intimate relationships. Advances in cancer management have extended patient survival, underscoring the importance of addressing sexual health post-diagnosis. Objectives: To explore physicians' practices regarding the approach to sexual health during oncological consultations; identifying barriers to addressing sexuality and assessing the need for sexual health training. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study that assessed the management of sexual health by physicians involved in oncological treatment, using an anonymous questionnaire distributed via SurveyMonkey. Results: Of 133 physicians surveyed, 31.6% never or rarely address sexual health. Only 10.5% feel frequently prepared on this topic, while 24.8% almost never have the appropriate tools to address it. 97.7% of oncologists and 92.9% of otolaryngologists (ENTs) recognize the need for sexual health training. Sexual health was more frequently discussed among patients diagnosed with prostate, cervical and breast cancer, and less so among those with ENT, bladder and colorectal tumours. The approach was more frequent among patients treated with curative intent (77.4%) than those with palliative intent (5%). The main barriers identified were lack of training (46%), lack of time (39.8%) and patient discomfort (34.6%). Conclusion: The majority of professionals dealing with oncological patients do not address their sexual health, with the lack of training, lack of time and patient discomfort being the main barriers identified. However, 92% indicate a need for sexual health training, which could contribute to early intervention, strategy establishment and timely referral to specialists in the field.

Indexed as

attitudes and health practicecancer survivorscommunication barriersknowledgesexual health

Identifiers

PMID39430079
PMCPMC11489118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.