ReviewInternational journal of ophthalmology2024
Corneal and intraocular pressure changes associated to the circadian rhythms: a narrative review.
Review in International journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Corneal Geometry and Refractive Fluctuations Throughout the Day in Orthokeratology Wearers: A Preliminary Study.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Targeting Rap1-YAP1 mechanosignaling for ameliorating acute IOP elevation-induced trabecular meshwork dysfunction.iScience · 2026Article
- Agreement between Pentacam HR and Visionix VX650 system for corneal and anterior chamber parameters.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Diurnal Variations in Anterior and Posterior Corneal Thickness and Curvature in Healthy Eyes: Global and Sector-Based Metrics and Lifestyle Associations.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prediction of intraocular pressure reduction after phacoemulsification surgery: A prospective observational study.Medicine · 2026Observational
- Ocular biometric characteristics in young Saudi adults across varying degrees of myopia.PeerJ · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo synthesize the current body of research regarding the diurnal variations in intraocular pressure (IOP) and corneal biomechanical and morphological parameters, highlighting their significance in various eye conditions.
methodsA comprehensive review of studies on the diurnal variations of IOP and corneal parameters was conducted. Tonometry findings from various studies were assessed, including the Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and non-contact tonometers. Data on the variations in central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature, and corneal biomechanics measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer system across different population groups was extracted and analyzed.
resultsIn both healthy subjects and those with Fuchs dystrophy, IOP and CCT demonstrate marked diurnal declines. GAT remains the gold standard for tonometry, with the highest reliability. However, its measurements are influenced by CCT. Keratoconus patients and those with pseudoexfoliation showed significant diurnal variations in IOP. The biomechanical parameters, especially corneal hysteresis (CH) and the corneal resistance factor (CRF), largely remain stable throughout the day for most of eye conditions, with some exceptions. Notably, the corneal morphology diurnal variation, particularly curvature, yielded mixed conclusions across studies.
conclusionCircadian rhythms significantly influence various corneal parameters, most notably IOP and CCT. Further studies should emphasize standardized approaches larger sample sizes, and delve deeper into less-explored areas, such as the effects of orthokeratology lenses on diurnal biomechanical shifts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.