ArticleCureus2024
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Stroke Unit of a Portuguese Community Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is essential to understand the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on stroke care, contemplating the potential health and economic consequences of missed diagnoses or treatments. This study examined the pandemic's effects on stroke epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and treatment in a hospital setting, comparing data from March 2020 to February 2021 with the homologous period the previous year. A secondary analysis focused on the state of emergency periods (March 19 to May 2 and November 6 to February 28). The sample included 730 stroke admissions, with 343 during the pandemic. There was a 24.75% reduction in the average daily occupancy rate (p<0.001) and a slight decrease in average daily admissions, especially in June from 132% to 74% (p=0.01). There was a moderate negative correlation between the number of COVID-19 cases and occupancy rates in January (r{s}=-0.422, p=0.01) and February (r{s}=-0.532, p=0.01). Admissions for ischemic stroke decreased by 7.2% (p=0.026), particularly mild events, with a 6.8% decrease in lacunar syndromes (p=0.048). Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) increased by 5.4% (p=0.046), while intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) decreased by 2.8% (p=0.048), especially in severe stroke cases (-21.4%, p=0.001). The pandemic period documented more MT procedures than IVT. Hemorrhagic stroke admissions increased by 6.7% (p=0.01). The analysis suggests a reduction in mild ischemic stroke admissions and fewer patients undergoing IVT for severe strokes during the pandemic. Broader-scale studies are necessary to confirm these findings. Considering the documented decline in diagnosis and treatment, minimizing the impact on stroke care during potential sanitary crises is paramount.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.