ArticleIEEE sensors journal2024
Evaluating the Effects of Breaking Vacuum During the Fabrication of Amorphous Selenium Detectors.
Article in IEEE sensors journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterization of Thick Selenium Layers for Dual-Layer X-ray Imaging.IEEE transactions on nuclear science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Direct conversion X-ray detectors offer high spatial resolution and improved sensitivity over indirect conversion detectors. As interest increases in their applications, including utilization as the top layer in dual-layer detectors for polyenergetic X-ray detection, additional studies on fabrication techniques are required. Amorphous selenium is a well-studied high-Z semiconductor capable of high-resolution and high-sensitivity imaging in direct architectures. It is already commercially available for mammography, and much work has gone into developing it for higher-energy applications (>20 keV.) To fully attenuate energies required for the low energy (<35 keV) top layer in dual-layer detectors, a-Se thicknesses greater than 200 μm must be fabricated. However, evaporation crucibles have limited capacity and require reloading of crucible material to achieve higher thicknesses, which is performed by opening the chamber and breaking vacuum mid-fabrication. We investigate the effects of splitting the fabrication into two depositions - exposing the sample to air in between - on device performance. We find that there is no significant effect on the transport properties, and a small range of performance parameters can be found - suggesting small fluctuations between devices of ± 5%, independent of fabrication technique and thickness. This implies that as we increase our thicknesses to those required for the low-energy layer of the dual-layer detector, we can expect performance to be maintained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.