ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Early experience and perioperative risk of GammaTile for upfront brain metastases: Report from a prospective multicenter study.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04427384 (A Multicenter Observational Study of GammaTile™ Surgically Targeted Radiation Therapy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter Observational Study of GammaTile™ Surgically Targeted Radiation Therapy (STaRT) in Intracranial Brain Neoplasms
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: GammaTile (GT), a form of brachytherapy utilizing cesium-131 seeds in a bioresorbable collagen tile, has gained popularity for the treatment of recurrent intracranial tumors and more recently for newly diagnosed metastases. This study reports early experience utilizing GT in upfront brain metastases with a focus on clinical applications and perioperative safety. Methods: The STaRT Registry (NCT04427384) was queried for all patients receiving GT for upfront metastases from August 2021 to August 2023. Data regarding patient demographics, procedure details, and adverse events (AEs) were extracted and analyzed. Results: Twenty-eight patients, median age 65 years (range 28-81), with 30 treated metastases were reported from 6 institutions. Patients had 2.8 metastases on average (range 1-15) at the time of surgery; however, most patients had a single metastasis (60.7%). The mean diameter of treated metastases was 3.4 cm (range 1.5-4.7). A median of 4.0 tiles (range 1-10) were used per tumor. The median follow-up was 3.0 months (range 1.0-11.2) with 6 attributed AEs (21.4%), including 1 grade ≥ 3 (infection). In the immediate postoperative period (<14 days), 2 patients reported pain or headache, and 1 reported facial edema. One patient developed seizures on postoperative day 8 requiring medication. At 1-month follow-up, there was 1 superficial wound infection, in a previously colonized patient, requiring surgical intervention without explantation of tiles. At 3-month follow-up, 1 patient reported facial pain not requiring treatment. There were no symptomatic hematomas. Conclusions: GT demonstrates a favorable safety profile in upfront brain metastases with a 3.6% rate of serious AEs (grade ≥ 3) within 90 days of the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.