ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024
Number of Resected Lymph Nodes and Survival Status in Node-Negative Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Cohort Study.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lymph Node Yield and Disease-Free Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Observational
- Single-port laparoscopic versus multiple-port laparoscopic combined with thoracoscopic for McKeown esophagectomy: a randomized clinical trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the association between survival status and the number of resected lymph nodes in node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC) after surgical treatment. Methods: This was a retrospective observational cohort study and data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (SEER) and TaiZhou hospital in China. The data for subjects with negative lymph nodes and no distant metastasis (pN0M0) after post-operative pathology were screened. The nonlinear relationship between resected lymph node number and survival status in node-negative ESCC was conducted using restricted cubic spline regression analysis. The association between the number of resected lymph nodes and survival status in node-negative ESCC was evaluated by Cox proportional hazards regression models. Subgroup analysis based on different subgroups was also performed. Results: A total of 999 subjects were included in the study. Restricted cubic spline regression was used to show a U shaped association between the number of resected lymph nodes and survival status in node-negative ESCC, with low count associated with a decreased survival. To elucidate the association, we adjusted for age, sex, race, T stage, TNM (tumor node metastasis classification), location, grade, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. As the resected lymph node number increased by one node, the survival status was improved by 2% (Hazard ratio(HR) = 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-0.99). Sensitivity analysis indicate that the effect size and direction in different subgroups are consistent, the results is stability in SEER. Conclusion: A low count of resected lymph nodes correlated with reduced survival in patients with ESCC, where resecting 25 to 28 or more nodes is considered optimal. Larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.