ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024
A Study on the Current Situation and Related Factors of Personal Mastery in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A Study on the Current Situation and Related Factors of Personal Mastery in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: A Cross-Sectional Study [Letter].International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the status quo and influencing factors of personal mastery in Chinese patients with chronic heart failure, based on the analysis of patient characteristics. Methods: The sample of the study comprised 249 chronic heart failure patients who visited a university hospital in China. We collected the data using general demographic Information, personal mastery scale, the Simple Coping Style Questionnaire and Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Quality of Life Questionnaire (MLHFQ). SPSS26.0 was used to describe the survey results statistically, and univariate analysis, Pearson correlation analysis and multiple linear regression were used to analyze the influencing factors of personal sense of control. Results: Chronic heart failure patients' total personal mastery scores were (20.63±4.486), which is in the medium level. Multiple linear regression analysis shows that Age group (β=-1.627, p=0.036), NYHA functional classification (β=-1.563, P<0.001), Positive coping style (β= 0.088, P=0.004) and MLHFQ (β= -0.121 P<0.001) significantly influenced patients' personal mastery (P<0.001). Conclusion: Our study suggests that the personal mastery of patients with chronic heart failure is at a moderate level in China. Additionally, age group, NYHA functional classification, Positive coping style and MLHFQ emerged as significant influencing factors. Clinical staff should dynamically observe the changes in the level of personal mastery of patients with chronic heart failure, pay more attention to the elderly and patients with poor heart function according to the influencing factors, and encourage active responses to improve the level of personal mastery of patients with heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.