ArticleJournal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab2024
Rapid and sensitive liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric methods for the quantitation of dolutegravir in human plasma and breast milk.
Article in Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry method for simultaneous determination of dolutegravir, nevirapine, efavirenz, rifampicin and rifapentine concentrations in human plasma.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Dolutegravir (DTG) is part of a first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV management in drug-naïve individuals and is recommended for the treatment of HIV during pregnancy. Robust analytical tools to quantify DTG are necessary to support clinical trials that characterize its multi-compartment drug distribution. Methods: Potassium EDTA (K Results: Analytical measuring ranges for DTG quantitation in plasma and breast milk were 100-10,000 ng/mL and 0.500 to 1000 ng/mL, respectively. Inter-assay precision and accuracy were 2.73 % to 3.41 % and -10.6 % to -5.37 % for plasma, and 4.24 % to 12.4 % and -5.63 % to 7.49 % for breast milk, respectively. DTG was stable for three freeze-thaw cycles and for at least 72 h at room temperature in matrix (plasma or breast milk). Additionally, whole blood was stable for 24 h at room temperature and 2 h under conditions of extended heat and humidity. Matrix effects for DTG in plasma and breast milk ranged from 101 % to 108 % and 78.2 % to 99.3 %, respectively. Quantitation in remnant plasma samples yielded measurable concentrations within the primary linearity of the assay. Conclusions: Methods to quantify DTG in human plasma and breast milk have been developed and validated. These assays were designed to satisfy all criteria for implementation in clinical and clinical trial settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.