Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39429919›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2024

NMR metabolomics of plant and yeast-based hydrolysates for cell culture media applications - A comprehensive assessment.

Michelle Combe, Kathy Sharon Isaac, Greg Potter, Stanislav Sokolenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michelle CombeProcess Engineering and Applied Science, Dalhousie University, 5273 DaCosta Row, PO Box 15000, Halifax, B3H 4R2, NS, Canada.
Kathy Sharon IsaacProcess Engineering and Applied Science, Dalhousie University, 5273 DaCosta Row, PO Box 15000, Halifax, B3H 4R2, NS, Canada.
Greg PotterLipiferm Scientific, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Stanislav SokolenkoProcess Engineering and Applied Science, Dalhousie University, 5273 DaCosta Row, PO Box 15000, Halifax, B3H 4R2, NS, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultivated meat products, generated by growing isolated skeletal muscle and fat tissue, offer the promise of a more sustainable and ethical alternative to traditional meat production. However, with cell culture media used to grow the cells accounting for 55-95% of the overall production cost, achieving true sustainability requires significant media optimization. One means of dealing with these high costs is the use of low-cost complex additives such as hydrolysates to provide a wide range of nutrients, from small molecules (metabolites) to growth factors and peptides. Despite their potential, most hydrolysate products remain poorly characterized and many are thought to suffer from persistent issues of high batch-to-batch variability. Although there have been a number of isolated efforts to determine metabolic profiles for a handful of hydrolysate products, we present the first attempt at a more comprehensive metabolomic characterization of nine different products (four plant and five yeast-based) from two to four different lots each. NMR analysis identified 90 unique metabolites, with only 15 metabolites common to all hydrolysate products (including eight of the nine essential amino acids), and 16 metabolites found in only a single hydrolysate product. The different hydrolysate products were found to have substantial differences in metabolite concentrations (as a fraction of overall mass), ranging from a high of 43% in yeast extract to a low of 14% in soy hydrolysates. The proportion of various metabolites also varied between products, with carbohydrate concentrations particularly high in soy hydrolysates and nucleosides more prominent in two of the yeast products. Overall, yeast extract generally had higher metabolite concentrations than all the other products, whereas both yeast extract and cotton had the largest variety of metabolites. A direct calculation of batch-to-batch variability revealed although there are significant differences between lots, these are largely driven by a relatively small fraction of compounds. This report will hopefully serve as a useful starting point for a more nuanced consideration of hydrolysate products in cell culture media optimization, both in the context of cultivated meat and beyond.

Indexed as

Cultivated meatHydrolysatesMetabolomicsNuclear magnetic resonance

Identifiers

PMID39429919
PMCPMC11490674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.