ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2024
Incomplete Thermal Ablation-Induced FOXP4-Mediated Promotion of Malignant Progression in Liver Cancer via NDST2.
Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Near-infrared/glutathione-activated CRISPR/Cas13a sensing platform for the detection of multiple microRNAs.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Construction of a prognostic risk model for acute myeloid leukemia based on exosomal genes and analysis of immune microenvironment characteristics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cancer stem cells in hepatocellular carcinoma: therapy resistance and emerging treatments.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The explosive progression of residual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following incomplete thermal ablation is challenging, and the underlying mechanisms require further exploration. We investigated the mechanism by which Forkhead box P4 (FOXP4) promotes the malignant transformation of residual HCC cells through N-deacetylase and N-sulfotransferase 2 (NDST2) after incomplete thermal ablation. Methods: The clinical significance of FOXP4 and NDST2 in HCC was evaluated using big data analysis. FOXP4 expression was detected in clinical samples of HCC. The gene expression levels in an in vitro heat-stressed HCC cell model were determined using quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) and Western blotting. The effects of the genes on heat-stressed HCC cells were investigated using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), scratch, Transwell migration, and invasion assays. Additionally, the regulatory relationship between FOXP4 and NDST2 was validated using the Cleavage Under Targets and Tagmentation (CUT&Tag) experiments and phenotypic assays. Results: High FOXP4 expression was correlated with liver cancer occurrence and development. In the heat-stressed HCC cell model, downregulating FOXP4 inhibited cancer cell progression. Besides, there was a positive association between FOXP4 and NDST2 in liver cancer. Suppressing FOXP4 reduced NDST2 expression in the heat-stressed HCC cells. Furthermore, reducing NDST2 expression weakened the biological behavior of heat-stressed HCC cells. Conclusion: FOXP4 and NDST2 are crucial in the incomplete thermal ablation of residual cancer. FOXP4 might regulate the biological progression of residual HCC after incomplete thermal ablation through NDST2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.