ArticleiMeta2024
iNAP 2.0: Harnessing metabolic complementarity in microbial network analysis.
Article in iMeta, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Proposed Cross-Feeding Model of Phenanthrene Degradation by Constructed Halophilic Consortium NOMA.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Review
- Rhizobial Inoculation Improves Soil Properties and Microbial Network Stability to SupportMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Machine Learning-Guided Synthetic Microbial Communities Enable Functional and Sustainable Degradation of Persistent Environmental Pollutants.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Unique ecology of co-occurring functionally and phylogenetically undescribed species in the infant oral microbiome.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Microbial synthesis structures organic compound composition in anaerobic digestion.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- Metabolic division of labor drives estuarine-coastal N2O emissions.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- Mechanisms by stand density regulates soil multifunctionality via soil environment and microbial network topology in aFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Quorum-sensing microbial dark matter enables core functions in wastewater microbiomes.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Overlooked siderophore producers favor ammonium oxidation in global wastewater treatment plants.Microbiome · 2025Article
- Mitochondrial Metabolomics in Cancer: Mass Spectrometry-Based Approaches for Metabolic Rewiring Analysis and Therapeutic Discovery.Metabolites · 2025Review
- Article
- MicrobiomeStatPlots: Microbiome statistics plotting gallery for meta-omics and bioinformatics.iMeta · 2025Article
- Synthetic microbial community improves chicken intestinal homeostasis and provokes anti-Salmonella immunity mediated by segmented filamentous bacteria.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Long-term cultivation of grass-legume mixtures changed the assembly process of the microbial community and increased microbial community stability.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Metabolic interdependencies in thermophilic communities are revealed using co-occurrence and complementarity networks.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the widespread adoption of metagenomic sequencing, new perspectives have emerged for studying microbial ecological networks, yielding metabolic evidence of interspecies interactions that traditional co-occurrence networks cannot infer. This protocol introduces the integrated Network Analysis Pipeline 2.0 (iNAP 2.0), which features an innovative metabolic complementarity network for microbial studies from metagenomics sequencing data. iNAP 2.0 sets up a four-module process for metabolic interaction analysis, namely: (I) Prepare genome-scale metabolic models; (II) Infer pairwise interactions of genome-scale metabolic models; (III) Construct metabolic interaction networks; and (IV) Analyze metabolic interaction networks. Starting from metagenome-assembled or complete genomes, iNAP 2.0 offers a variety of methods to quantify the potential and trends of metabolic complementarity between models, including the PhyloMint pipeline based on phylogenetic distance-adjusted metabolic complementarity, the SMETANA (species metabolic interaction analysis) approach based on cross-feeding substrate exchange prediction, and metabolic distance calculation based on parsimonious flux balance analysis (pFBA). Notably, iNAP 2.0 integrates the random matrix theory (RMT) approach to find the suitable threshold for metabolic interaction network construction. Finally, the metabolic interaction networks can proceed to analysis using topological feature analysis such as hub node determination. In addition, a key feature of iNAP 2.0 is the identification of potentially transferable metabolites between species, presented as intermediate nodes that connect microbial nodes in the metabolic complementarity network. To illustrate these new features, we use a set of metagenome-assembled genomes as an example to comprehensively document the usage of the tools. iNAP 2.0 is available at https://inap.denglab.org.cn for all users to register and use for free.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.