Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39429881›Full record

ArticleiMeta2024

OmicShare tools: A zero-code interactive online platform for biological data analysis and visualization.

Hongyan Mu, Jianzhou Chen, Wenjie Huang, Gui Huang, Meiying Deng, Shimiao Hong, Peng Ai, Chuan Gao, Huangkai Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iMeta, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 160 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
160citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

160 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Phytochemical Characterization ofFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

100 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hongyan MuProduct Research and Development Center Guangzhou Genedenovo Technology Co. Ltd. Guangzhou China.ORCID 0009-0000-8958-0889
Jianzhou ChenProduct Research and Development Center Guangzhou Genedenovo Technology Co. Ltd. Guangzhou China.
Wenjie HuangProduct Research and Development Center Guangzhou Genedenovo Technology Co. Ltd. Guangzhou China.
Gui HuangProduct Research and Development Center Guangzhou Genedenovo Technology Co. Ltd. Guangzhou China.
Meiying DengProduct Research and Development Center Guangzhou Genedenovo Technology Co. Ltd. Guangzhou China.
Shimiao HongProduct Research and Development Center Guangzhou Genedenovo Technology Co. Ltd. Guangzhou China.
Peng AiProduct Research and Development Center Guangzhou Genedenovo Technology Co. Ltd. Guangzhou China.
Chuan GaoProduct Research and Development Center Guangzhou Genedenovo Technology Co. Ltd. Guangzhou China.
Huangkai ZhouProduct Research and Development Center Guangzhou Genedenovo Technology Co. Ltd. Guangzhou China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The OmicShare tools platform is a user-friendly online resource for data analysis and visualization, encompassing 161 bioinformatic tools. Users can easily track the progress of projects in real-time through an overview interface. The platform has a powerful interactive graphics engine that allows for the custom-tailored modification of charts generated from analyses. The visually appealing charts produced by OmicShare improve data interpretability and meet the requirements for publication. It has been acknowledged in over 4000 publications and is available in https://www.omicshare.com/tools/.

Identifiers

PMID39429881
PMCPMC11488081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.