ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2024
Barriers to reporting medical errors from the perspective of obstetric residents: A qualitative study.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge sharing: The key to improving medical error reporting in nursing.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient safety is one of the basic dimensions of quality of care. Medical errors are one of the most important and influential factors in the quality of care and clinical outcomes, which can have a significant economic effect. The aim of this study was to explore barriers to reporting medical errors from the perspective of obstetric residents. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a qualitative study using a conventional content analysis approach. Data collection was performed through 18 semi-structured and in-depth individual interviews and a group discussion session with 13 obstetricians in Tabriz, Iran. Purposeful sampling started in December 2021 and continued until data saturation in October 2022. Findings were analyzed concurrently with data collection using MAXQDA 10 software.
resultsFour categories were obtained after analysis of the data: individual and organizational factors, the nature of the error, the educational hierarchy, and the fear of reactions and consequences of error reporting.
conclusionConsidering the importance of patient safety, it is necessary to improve the quality of education and awareness of residents and direct supervision of attending, emphasize promoting professional communication and changing educational policies and strategies to reduce errors, and remove barriers to error reporting. Instead of blaming those in error, the organizational culture should support error reporting and reform the error-prone system, through which positive results will be achieved for both patients and healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.