Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39429804›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2024

Accurate birth weight prediction from fetal biometry using the Gompertz model.

Chandrani Kumari, Gautam I Menon, Leelavati Narlikar, Uma Ram, Rahul Siddharthan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chandrani KumariThe Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, India.
Gautam I MenonThe Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, India.
Leelavati NarlikarDepartments of Data Science and Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, India.
Uma RamObstetrics and Gynaecology, Seethapathy Clinic and Hospital, Chennai, India.
Rahul SiddharthanThe Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Monitoring of fetal growth and estimation of birth weight is of clinical importance. During pregnancy, ultrasound fetal biometry values including femur length, head circumference, abdominal circumference, biparietal diameter are measured and used to place fetuses on "growth charts". There is no simple growth-model-based, predictive formula in use for fetal biometry. Estimation of fetal weight at birth currently depends on ultrasound data taken a short time before birth. Study design: Our cohort ("Seethapathy cohort") consists of ultrasound biometry measurements and other data for 774 pregnant women in Chennai, India, 2015-2017. We use the Gompertz model, a standard model for constrained growth, with just three intuitive parameters, to model the growth of fetal biometry, and a machine learning (ML) model trained on these parameters to predict birth weight (BW). Results: The Gompertz model convincingly fits the growth of fetal biometry values. Two Gompertz parameters- Conclusions: The Gompertz model fits fetal biometry growth and enables birth weight estimation without need of late-term ultrasounds. Aside from its clinical predictive value, we suggest its use for future growth standards, with almost all variation described by a single scale parameter

Indexed as

Birth weightFetal growthGompertz modelMachine learningPregnancyUltrasound biometry

Identifiers

PMID39429804
PMCPMC11490867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.