ArticleiScience2024
Action-based confidence sharing and collective decision making.
Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Best-of-n decision making by human groups.PloS one · 2026Article
- Continuous dynamics of cooperation and competition in social decision-making.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Joint action research explores how multiple humans can coordinate their movements to achieve common goals. When there is uncertainty about the joint goal, individuals need to integrate their perceptual information of the environment to collaboratively determine their new goal. To ensure that a group reaches a consensus about the goal, collective decision making among the individuals is required. Collective decision making can be facilitated by nonverbal expressions of opinions and associated confidence levels. Here, we show that confidence sharing in groups of 2, 3, and 4 individuals can be studied using their trajectories when jointly moving toward one of several options. We found that both opinions and confidence levels can be distinguished in individual movement trajectories, and found that movement features can predict an individual's influence. Our results suggest that movement trajectories are a valid way to study confidence sharing in human collective decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.