Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39429722›Full record

ArticleQatar medical journal2024

Reversible postoperative vision loss (POVL): A tale of four patients.

Nissar Shaikh, Seema Nahid, Firdos Ummunnisa, Umm E Amara, Umme Nasrah, Azha Fatima, Fateen Shareef, Abul Rahman Balal

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Qatar medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nissar ShaikhHamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar *Email: snahid@hamad.qa.
Seema NahidHamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar *Email: snahid@hamad.qa.
Firdos UmmunnisaHalima AL Tamim OBGY Clinic, Doha, Qatar.
Umm E AmaraApollo Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Umme NasrahDeccan Medical College, Hyderabad, India.
Azha FatimaKamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Fateen ShareefDeccan Medical College, Hyderabad, India.
Abul Rahman BalalHamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar *Email: snahid@hamad.qa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a clinic-imaging entity. PRES is rarely reported in the perioperative period to cause reversible postoperative vision loss (POVL). It is reported in the literature in the form of case reports for spinal and cardiac surgeries and eclampsia patients. The suggested diagnostic criteria for PRES are: (i) acute onset of neurological symptoms and signs; (ii) specific findings of vasogenic cerebral edema upon imaging studies; and (iii) reversibility of signs and symptoms as well as image study findings. We report a case series of four patients undergoing other than spinal, cardiac, or orthopedic surgeries who developed PRES and had reversible POVL. Cases: The first case was a young female who had laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, had extreme hypertension at induction of anesthesia, had surgery and developed POVL after a few hours in the postoperative period, and had convulsions diagnosed to have PRES after computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Managed with blood pressure and seizure control, vision returned gradually from 2nd postoperative day. The second case was also a young female who had appendicitis, requiring an appendectomy. Complicated by septic shock. Post-surgery, she was extubated after 1 day and immediately complained of total blindness. Local causes were ruled out, and an MRI diagnosed PRES. With supportive therapy, her vision started to return by Day 3 with improved normal vision. The third case was a female with recently diagnosed diabetes mellitus who presented with right upper limb embolic ischemia and had an embolectomy with a return of circulation. Her blood pressure was high and reached up to 200 mmHg after induction of anesthesia, which was controlled with deep anesthesia and a labetalol infusion in the perioperative period. After 8 h in the postoperative period, she was awake but searching for available objects. Relatives complained that she was unable to see. Local and fundus examinations were normal. She was awake but blind. Imaging studies confirmed PRES. Blood pressure was controlled using a labetalol infusion and continued supportive therapy. By Day 3, her vision became normal. The fourth case was an elderly patient who had hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease. He underwent a right carotid endarterectomy under general anesthesia. He had severe hypertension in the perioperative area and blood pressure was controlled using a labetalol infusion. The surgery went smoothly. After 3 h, he had a loss of vision. Imaging studies confirmed PRES. His blood pressure was kept normal. After 2 days, his vision gradually returned to normal. Follow-up MRIs in the outpatient clinic for all four patients normalized in due time. Conclusion: Extremes of hypertension and/or hypotension in the perioperative period can cause PRES, which may lead to reversible POVL.

Indexed as

Hypertensionhypotensionmagnetic resonance imagingpostoperative vision lossreversible

Identifiers

PMID39429722
PMCPMC11490035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.