ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2024
Impulse Oscillometry Combined to FeNO in Relation to Asthma Control Among Preschool Children.
Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of breathing frequency on respiratory oscillometry measurements: a randomised cross-over and observational study of asthma patients.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Trial
- Breathing Out the Truth: What Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide Really Tells Us About Pediatric Asthma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Metabolomic Approaches to Lung Function in Pediatric Asthma: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Short-term efficacy of nebulized budesonide for allergic airway inflammation in young children and dynamic changes in fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO): a retrospective cohort study.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- The Role of IOS in Identification of Specific Treatable Traits in Pediatric Asthma: Current Limitations and Future Perspectives-Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to observe and analyze the differences in impulse oscillometry (IOS) and fractional expiratory nitric oxide (FeNO) in relation to asthma control among preschool children, and to explore the predictive value of IOS combined with FeNO for uncontrolled asthma. Methods: This study enrolled 171 preschool children with asthma and 30 healthy preschool children between June 2022 and June 2023. We categorized the asthmatic children as having controlled asthma (n=85) and uncontrolled asthma (n=86) after a 3-month follow-up. IOS and FeNO were collected on the first visit at baseline. Differences in metrics were compared between controlled asthma, uncontrolled asthma and healthy control groups. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was utilized to explore the discriminative ability of IOS and FeNO, alone or in combination, against uncontrolled asthma. Results: Compared to the controlled asthma group, the IOS values of R5, X5, R5-R20, and Fres were significantly higher in the uncontrolled asthma group, except for R20. R5 and R5-R20 had the highest area under the curve (AUC), which could reach 0.74 (95% CI 0.66-0.82) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.64-0.80). R20 had the lowest AUC of 0.59. The AUC for FeNO alone was 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.93) with a cutoff value of 17.50 ppb, sensitivity and specificity of 0.73 and 0.89. The AUCs of all IOS metrics combined with FeNO were significantly higher, with the highest AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.87-0.96) for R5-R20+FeNO, and with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.88 and 0.84. Conclusion: There were significant differences in IOS and FeNO in relation to asthma control among preschooler children. FeNO might be the best predictor of asthma control, and adding any of IOS metrics increased moderately the predictive value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.