ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024
The effect of rhythmic stimuli with spatial information on sensorimotor synchronization: an EEG and EMG study.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Environmental effects on inter-brain coupling: a systematic review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sensorimotor synchronization (SMS) is the human ability to align body movement rhythms with external rhythmic stimuli. While the effects of rhythmic stimuli containing only temporal information on SMS have been extensively studied, less is known about how spatial information affects SMS performance. This study investigates the neural mechanisms underlying SMS with rhythmic stimuli that include both temporal and spatial information, providing insights into the influence of these factors across different sensory modalities. Methods: This study compared the effects temporal information and spatial information on SMS performance across different stimuli conditions. We simultaneously recorded the electroencephalogram (EEG), the electromyogram (EMG), and behavioral data as subjects performed synchronized tapping to rhythmic stimuli. The study analyzed SMS performance under conditions including auditory, visual, and auditory-visual motion stimuli (containing both temporal and spatial information), as well as auditory, visual, and auditory-visual non-motion stimuli (containing only temporal information). Specifically, the research examined behavioral data (i.e., mean asynchrony, absolute asynchrony, and variability), neural oscillations, cortico-muscular coherence (CMC), and brain connectivity. Results: The results demonstrated that SMS performance was superior with rhythmic stimuli containing both temporal and spatial information compared to stimuli with only temporal information. Moreover, sensory-motor neural entrainment was stronger during SMS with rhythmic stimuli containing spatial information within the same sensory modality. SMS with both types of rhythmic stimuli was found to be dynamically modulated by neural oscillations and cortical-muscular coupling in the beta band (13-30 Hz). Discussion: These findings provide deeper insights into the combined effects of temporal and spatial information, as well as sensory modality, on SMS performance. The study highlights the dynamic modulation of SMS by neural oscillations and CMC, particularly in the beta band, offering valuable contributions to understanding the neural basis of sensorimotor synchronization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.