ArticleJuntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal2024
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict Post-dispatch Cancellation of Physician-staffed Rapid Car.
Article in Juntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning prediction model for post-dispatch cancellation of physician-staffed rapid car. Materials: Data were extracted from the physician-staffed rapid response car database at our Hospital between April 2017 and March 2019. Methods: After obtaining 2019 cases, we divided the dataset into a training set for developing the model and a test set for validation using stratified random sampling with an 8 : 2 allocation ratio. We selected random forest as the machine-learning classifier. The outcome was the post-dispatch cancellation of a rapid car. The model was trained using predictor variables, including 18 different reasons for rapid car request, age and gender of a patient, date (month), and distance from the hospital. Results: This machine learning model predicted the occurrence of post-dispatch cancellation of rapid cars with an accuracy of 75.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 71.0-79.6], sensitivity of 81.5% (CI: 75.0-86.9), specificity of 70.8% (CI: 64.4-76.6), and an area under the receiver operating characteristic value of 0.83 (CI: 0.79-0.87). The important features were distance from the hospital to the scene, age, suspicion of non-witnessed cardiac arrest, farthest geographic area, and date (months). Conclusions: We developed a favorable machine learning model to predict post-dispatch cancellation of rapid cars in a local district. This study suggests the potential of machine-learning models in improving the efficiency of dispatching physicians outside hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.