Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39429679›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2024

Adverse events of topical ocular prostaglandin medications for glaucoma treatment: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.

Shi-Nan Wu, Caihong Huang, Yu-Qian Wang, Xiang Li, Si-Qi Zhang, Xiao-Dong Chen, Dan-Yi Qin, Linfangzi Zhu, Jia-Yi Wen, Na-Chuan Luo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shi-Nan WuXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6992-9059
Caihong HuangXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Yu-Qian WangXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Xiang LiXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Si-Qi ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Xiao-Dong ChenXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Dan-Yi QinXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Linfangzi ZhuXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Jia-Yi WenDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiangxi Branch of the National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Na-Chuan LuoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jiaoyue HuXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, 401 Chengyi Build, Xiang-an Campus of Xiamen University, South Xiang-an Road, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, China.
Zuguo LiuXiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, 401 Chengyi Build, Xiang-an Campus of Xiamen University, South Xiang-an Road, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As prostaglandin medications, crucial in glaucoma treatment, become more widely used, their local adverse events are increasingly observed. Objectives: To evaluate the common adverse events of four clinically commonly used prostaglandin F (FP) receptor agonists in the treatment of glaucoma in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Design: We screened and analyzed the generic and brand names of latanoprost, bimatoprost, travoprost, and tafluprost in the FAERS database and summarized and cleaned the baseline information of subjects receiving the above-mentioned drugs. Methods: Perform descriptive statistical analysis on the baseline information of subjects using the drugs. Conduct disproportionality analysis of drug-related adverse events. The criteria for positive signals of adverse events are established by simultaneously meeting the thresholds set by four methods: the ratio of reported odds, proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker. Additionally, assess the cumulative risk curves for drug-induced time of the aforementioned drugs and use one-way ANOVA to compare differences in drug-induced time across different groups. Results: The study included 1567 latanoprost, 1517 bimatoprost, 696 travoprost, and 82 tafluprost subjects. Adverse events mainly affected eye disorders, with significant issues in iris hyperpigmentation, ocular pemphigoid, corneal endothelial cell loss, periorbital fat atrophy, corneal irritation, eyelash growth, and ocular hyperemia. The time to onset varied among drugs, with latanoprost showing the longest (mean days = 344.37) and bimatoprost the shortest duration (mean days = 155.65; Conclusion: Although signal detection analysis based on the FAERS database cannot establish a definitive causal relationship, our study found that FP receptor agonists used in glaucoma can cause various adverse events. Assessing their clinical suitability and potential side effects is crucial for providing personalized treatment and ensuring medication safety.

Indexed as

drug adverse eventsdrug-induced timeFAERSglaucomaprostaglandin medications

Identifiers

PMID39429679
PMCPMC11487502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.