Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39429606›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Using the GoogLeNet deep-learning model to distinguish between benign and malignant breast masses based on conventional ultrasound: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jinli Wang, Jin Tong, Jun Li, Chunli Cao, Sirui Wang, Tianyu Bi, Peishan Zhu, Linan Shi, Yaqian Deng, Ting Ma and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jinli Wang *Department of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Jin Tong *Department of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Jun LiDepartment of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Chunli CaoDepartment of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Sirui WangDepartment of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Tianyu BiSchool of Business Administration, Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou, China.
Peishan ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Linan ShiDepartment of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Yaqian DengDepartment of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Ting MaDepartment of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Jixue HouDepartment of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Xinwu CuiDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies in women worldwide, and early and accurate diagnosis is crucial for improving treatment outcomes. Conventional ultrasound (CUS) is a widely used screening method for breast cancer; however, the subjective nature of interpreting the results can lead to diagnostic errors. The current study sought to estimate the effectiveness of using a GoogLeNet deep-learning convolutional neural network (CNN) model to identify benign and malignant breast masses based on CUS. Methods: A literature search was conducted of the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and other databases to retrieve studies related to GoogLeNet deep-learning CUS-based models published before July 15, 2023. The diagnostic performance of the GoogLeNet models was evaluated using several metrics, including pooled sensitivity (PSEN), pooled specificity (PSPE), the positive likelihood ratio (PLR), the negative likelihood ratio (NLR), the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the curve (AUC). The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Scale (QUADAS). The eligibility of the included literature were independently searched and assessed by two authors. Results: All of the 12 studies that used pathological findings as the gold standard were included in the meta-analysis. The overall average estimation of sensitivity and specificity was 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-0.89] and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.92), respectively. The PLR and NLR were 6.2 (95% CI: 3.9-9.9) and 0.17 (95% CI: 0.12-0.23), respectively. The DOR was 37.06 (95% CI: 20.78-66.10). The AUC was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94). No obvious publication bias was detected. Conclusions: The GoogLeNet deep-learning model, which uses a CNN, achieved good diagnostic results in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast masses in CUS-based images.

Indexed as

breast massdeep learningGoogLeNetmeta-analysisultrasound (US)

Identifiers

PMID39429606
PMCPMC11485374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.