ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Value of spectral parameters in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast nodules in non-enhanced chest CT.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dual-layer spectral computed tomography (DSCT) is capable of acquiring both conventional and spectral images during one routine scan, and is widely used for the quantitative and qualitative analyses of substances, differential diagnosis, and disease staging. However, limited research has been conducted on its performance in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast nodules using non-enhanced scans. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of multiple quantitative parameters derived from non-enhanced DSCT in differentiating benign from malignant breast nodules. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study examined a total of 121 breast nodules from 114 patients (malignant group: n=68; benign group: n=53) identified during chest physical examination or routine admission for the treatment of breast diseases at The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from March 2023 to December 2023. All the patients underwent DSCT scanning and pathological diagnosis. The DSCT quantitative parameters, including the effective atomic number (Zeff), computed tomography (CT) attenuation values at 40-70 keV, and the slope of the spectral Hounsfield unit curve (λHU), in non-enhanced images were measured. The λHU was calculated as follows: λHU = CT70 keV - CT40 keV/30 HU. Additionally, typical radiological features were analyzed. A DSCT parameter diagnostic model and a conventional CT diagnostic model were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The Delong test was used to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of each model. Results: The DSCT parameters, including the Zeff (P<0.001), λHU (P<0.001), and CT attenuation values at 40 keV (P<0.001) and 50 keV (P=0.001), as well as the presence of the lobular sign (P<0.001) and spicule sign (P<0.001), exhibited statistically significant differences between the benign and malignant groups. The logistic regression analysis revealed that the Zeff [odds ratio (OR): 9.22; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.11-40.35; P=0.003], λHU (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.52-0.79; P<0.001), 40 keV CT attenuation value (OR: 8.69; 95% CI: 3.28-23.06; P<0.001), 50 keV CT attenuation value (OR: 0.01; 95% CI: 0.001-0.07; P<0.001), and lobular sign (OR: 3.95; 95% CI: 1.52-10.31; P=0.005) were independent predictors of malignancy. Compared to the benign group, the malignant group had a higher likelihood of presenting with the lobular sign and higher Zeff values but lower λHU values. The ROC curve indicated that the Zeff had the highest diagnostic efficacy [area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC =0.792, 95% CI: 0.71-0.87]. Further, the DSCT parameter diagnostic model had improved diagnostic efficacy with an AUC of 0.899 (95% CI: 0.84-0.96), which was higher than the AUC of the conventional CT diagnostic model (AUC =0.796, 95% CI: 0.72-0.87). The Delong test revealed a statistically significant difference between these two models (P=0.04). Conclusions: DSCT parameters derived from non-enhanced DSCT images, such as the Zeff value and λHU, can be used to differentiate benign and malignant breast nodules, and the differential diagnosis efficacy of the DSCT parameters is higher than that of conventional CT parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.